Jail him now.
EXCERPT
Vindman is a Ukrainian American. He grew hostile with members who sought to understand exactly to whom he had disclosed the phone call.
Using detailed information from interviews with White House officials, members of Congress, and their key staff, York shows how Republicans had to deal with Rep. Adam Schiffs determination to hide from the American public not just who the whistleblower was but anything about the process that led to the whistleblower complaint.
But Schiffs behavior inadvertently confirmed how the whistleblower found his information. Every time that members asked about the second non-NSC person Vindman disclosed the call to, Schiff and other Democrats would direct the witness to not answer in order to protect the whistleblower. York writes:
Could that have been any clearer? The Republican line of questioning established that: 1) Vindman told two people outside the NSC. 2) One of them was George Kent. And 3) The other was in the Intelligence Community but could not be revealed because Democrats did not want to identify the whistleblower.
It did not take a rocket scientist to conclude that that unidentified other person was the whistleblower.
You mean jail him before we hang him, right?