Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: karpov

I am saddened to see that the choice HAS to be a woman. But I am equally concerned that the focus would be on anyone except a Constitutionalist whose primary purpose is to decide cases based on the actual words in the US Constitution.

Nothing more than that is really needed.

I certainly do not want to see a Supreme Court judge EVER decide a case based on feels, emotions, penumbras, wise-X personal experiences, etc., etc..


24 posted on 09/21/2020 6:33:17 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (The only thing worse than COVID-19 is Biden-20!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!
👍👍
31 posted on 09/21/2020 6:40:17 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!

I understand. However we can’t allow another Kavanaugh circus with drummed up rape, assault, molestation charges for hearing which could go on for months and months.

Because time is of essence with election going to be contested we have to get the court to 9 SC not 4-4.


108 posted on 09/21/2020 7:40:58 AM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!

What you said.


212 posted on 09/21/2020 1:29:38 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson