"This is going to the Supreme Court where they will rule the election is invalid due to fraud or mistakes on a country wide scale. It will go one of two ways, either they will rule that all the unconstitutional mail in ballots will be removed and the states ordered to recount without them or they will simply rule the election is invalid due to mass voter fraud and at that point it will be sent to the congress and senate for a vote.
This is where it gets good. The House/Congress votes on who the President will be. It has nothing to do with what party that has power. Every state gets one vote and 30 states are held by Republicans / 19 by Democrats.
They have to vote down party lines, they have no choice due to the 12th Amendment of the Constitution and the Senate votes for the Vice President where a similar event will take place. This is The Law. This is why the Democrats are so mad at Nancy Pelosi. This will happen in January. The only way President Trump won’t be president is if he concedes the election and that will never happen.
So stop watching the fake news and don’t let your heart be troubled and live your life knowing this will all work out. Another fun fact is when they called Gore the President elect back in 2000 until the courts ruled against him and declared Bush the winner –– the two people that were part of that decision was none other than new Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Why do you think the Democrats tried so hard to keep them from being confirmed."
Oh I am praying, praying for this
Thanks for this.
It would be great if this comes to pass, but seem like speculation at this point.
A contingent election!
You are talking about state governors, not House reps.
So which is the “one vote per state”?
Congress votes based on the governor of each state’s political party?
And if dems take the Senate then Harris will be Trump's Veep.
I SO hope you’re right.
Wow, some action finally. The path you describe, if it goes that way, will be historic and ugly, but it does describe where we have allowed ourselves as a nation to get to.
I was thinking that contingent elections could only happen where neither side could get to 270 (e.g in a “Faithless Electors” scenario).
If the fake ballots in PA can’t be disambiguated then SCOTUS could very well *invalidate* PA. Which is 20 EV.
Which - yes, depending on other recounts - could lead to a scenario where nobody had 270. And so - a contingent election.
You're almost right - close, but, as Bill would say, no cigar.
In order for the House to elect the President, the Special Joint Session of Congress on January 6 must first count the Electoral votes and certify that no one has a majority.
In the Special Joint Session, they DON'T vote by States, every Member and every Senator has one vote.
The votes in the Special Joint Session (presuming straight party line voting, we know Romney will vote for Biden) would be 50 + 223 Democrats and 50 + 213 Republicans, so all Electoral Vote challenges will be ruled in Biden's favor.
Once the Special Joint Session gives him 270, the House is out of the picture because a President will have been elected.
The above analysis presumes that the Democrats will steal both Georgia Senate seats.
Excellent.
Great explanation of how the president will be elected 12th amendment ping
1. State legislatures set election law, which cannot be over-ruled by courts or bureaucrats. Does this include other state AG’s? I don’t know.
2. Other pro-Trump states voters were disenfranchised by all the fraud in blue swing states. My state was +16 Trump and my vote was disenfranchised.
3. I hope this multi-state case clears standing.
The communists may have “crapped in their mess kit”...BIG TIME with this fraud BS. They all may soon be able to thank the vile, demonic Botoxian for this one. It would be such karma for not vetting the Kenyan Usurper as should have been done in the first place.
This is the most hopeful and thoughtful information that I’ve seen. Republican Attorneys General are a credible group and they lay out a very clear case that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rewrote the law in a manner that changed the election and created chaos.
I love Trump, but we need more of this specificity at this point to break through the media silence and convince courts that something completely outrageous happened.
Bttt.
5.56mm
This is where it gets good. The House/Congress votes on who the President will be. It has nothing to do with what party that has power. Every state gets one vote and 30 states are held by Republicans / 19 by Democrats.
That's not how it works. States choose their Electors. If for some reason a certain state's vote is tossed due to uncorrectable errors or fraud, then it is up to the state legislatures that choose their Electors.
Only if no candidate gets a majority in the Electoral College will the House then vote on a candidate for President, and the Senate vote on a candidate for Vice President.
You can't skip the Electoral College altogether.
Absolute nonsense.
I’m not sure the Supremes can order it to the House. They could declare it fraudulent in one or several states, I believe at that point it’s up to the state legislatures who could rely on that opinion on fraud, and vote for electors without regard to the fraudulent election. Of the states questioned, I believe only Nevada doesn’t have a Republican legislature, so things would lean Trump’s way. Obviously the Dems could appeal, but in the face of a determination of fraud, they’d lose in the same court. I think the only way it would get to the House would be a lack of a majority in the electoral college, which mathematically cold happen and would also favor Trump. Given what’s at state, can Trump present enough evidence the election results were fraudulent? Perhaps, since they’re looking at state elections, 2 or 3 frauds is all it would take.