Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gay State Conservative

Given the current state of CONgress, that would be no protection.


4 posted on 11/11/2020 4:05:56 AM PST by sauropod (Let them eat kale. I will not comply. Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: sauropod

Perhaps not...but I refer you to “Caetano v Massachusetts” as a source of hope that at least SCOTUS understands what “shall not be infringed” means.In that case SCOTUS overturned,by a 9-0 vote,a ruling by the Massachusetts State Supreme Court which denied Caetano her basic 2nd Amendment rights.


5 posted on 11/11/2020 4:28:11 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (BLM Stands For "Bidens Loot Millions"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson