Sorry I may seem so cynical but I think it is pragmatic. I have seen massive voter fraud with my own eyes and I know why they want Mail in Voting
If voting made any difference, do you think they would let us do it?
Saying it’s “pragmatic” means it’s good for something. Surrender is good for nothing. Massive voter fraud was the norm in the 19th Century. It was stopped at some point, and fell out of favor. OK. It came back with a roar this year. We have a man who is fighting it to the bitter end. In this we’re very fortunate. If he were to give up, effective voting would be a thing of the past, but he’s willing to go all the way, and I’m still rooting for him to win, and doing whatever I can to help, however marginal.