Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

I am certain that we will look back on this insanity with anger because a bunch of bureaucrats and journalists filled us with false hope.

Masking was shown prior to last year to be ineffective against viral transmission. Keep in mind that those studies were also not looking at long-term mask wearing the same cloth masks all day - they were focused on short-term exposures with dry clean N95 masks.

Today we have much of our nation wearing the same dirty mask all day and every day. We are breathing warm and moist air from our nose and mouth onto a cloth medium that traps particles. Food particles, nose particles, abraided and shed skin particles, spittle, oils from our skin, etc etc.

We are essentially wearing a petri dish over our nose and mouth breathing in bacteria that flourishes in warm and humid environments. How many people might have survived covid if their body was not full of bacterial pneumonia and other nasty stuff because they have been breathing it in for months?

Again, from what I have seen online that appears to be reputable and sound, the studies that are being cited in support of masking are based on dry clean masks and short term usage.

That does not even factor in proper wearing of the masks with a good seal so that it functions properly.

Legitimate questions.....


15 posted on 02/01/2021 9:16:03 AM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: volunbeer

[[Masking was shown prior to last year to be ineffective against viral transmission]]

If we had any lawyers with guts, they would take this to court and demand that advocates for masks prove that masks have enough benefits to mandate that people wear them in public. And be prepared with evidence that people are infact getting sick while wearing them, and possibly proving g that masks increase your chances of getting ill.

Hard to believe that lawyers aren’t suing for fami.ies that have lost loved ones who wore masks, but maybe its too hard to prove they “wouldn’t have gotten sick had theyno t worn masks”?

BUT, this is what the mask advocates are doing, ru.ing o. What “might happen” and c.aiming, without evidence that masks save lives. Funny though. In The beginning, they all breathlessly exclaimed that masks didn’t protect. Then apparent.y people like Beijing Biden, fauci and ilk, who probably have stoc, in masks made in China, declared, without evidence once again, that masks save lives, and now its evidently law


30 posted on 02/01/2021 9:35:35 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: volunbeer

Seriously.

There is a lot of REAL science indicating that COVID—like cruise ship noroviruses—is spread primarily be fecal to oral transmission.

Let that sink in.

Remember about a year ago when there were a few quickly buried stories about communities in the New England states that were going to start testing sewerage for COVID?

Let that sink in.

Now consider this: In many States (Pennsylvania and Ohio for sure) the mask mandates are explicit that those in restaurants MUST wear a mask INTO THE RESTROOM where of course that cloth will absorb all toilet odors and other zhit.

Let that sink in.

Then the patron MUST wear the zhit laden mask back into the restaurant so that with every exhale the patrons innocently eating pancakes can get a dose of the restroom zhit.

Let that sink in.

Still hungry for indoor restaurant dining?


44 posted on 02/02/2021 4:01:03 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson