Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems’ COVID-19 Bill Is A Grab-Bag Of Leftist Goodies — Not Stimulus
Issues & Insights ^ | 4 February 2021 | Editorial Board

Posted on 02/03/2021 10:04:13 PM PST by amorphous

After a group of 10 Senate Republicans duly trudged to the White House on Monday to show their “bipartisanship” on yet another COVID-19 stimulus bill, President Joe Biden did the predictable: He looked at their outreached hand of political comity and spat on it. Just as well, since the only thing the Democrats’ plan will “stimulate” will be more debt.

Biden and his party were never really interested in bipartisanship at all, despite their claims to the contrary. The whole point of this choreographed Kabuki political theater was to humiliate the Republicans, who foolishly took Biden and the Democrats at their word.

Republicans had suggested a more-or-less stripped-down bill of “just” $600 billion, compared to the Democratic wish-list of $1.9 trillion, which includes such non-COVID-19-related items as a $15-an-hour national minimum wage, a $350 billion bailout for poorly run states and cities, $170 billion for K-12 schools and colleges, $25 billion for “rental assistance,” and so on. Democrats also want checks of $1,400 for most households.

Republicans seek checks of $1,000, but would exclude families with more than $50,000 in income from the handouts. Their spending on all other aid is roughly two-thirds what the Democrats seek.

In rejecting compromise, Biden gave Congress a green light to totally ignore Republican input by passing a stimulus package through reconciliation, not the normal budget process. That will require a simple majority of 51 senators, not a supermajority of 60, to pass.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer confirmed this Tuesday, saying: “Joe Biden is totally on board with using reconciliation” to pass the bill.

So, just as with Obamacare, the fix is in on the Democrats’ all-or-nothing bill, loaded with goodies for far-left interest groups, teachers unions and Blue State governors.

But a few points need to be made here, not just about this bill, but about stimulus in general.

First, the economy is already recovering. It grew 33.4% in the third quarter and 4% in the fourth, following 2020’s disastrous 31.4% second quarter plunge. Unemployment peaked a 14.8% last April, but fell to 6.7% in December, far better than any official forecasts.

We’ve already committed $4 trillion in spending on COVID-19 over the past 10 months, but still have an estimated $1 trillion left unspent. Add another $1.9 trillion, and you see that COVID-19 adds to our already massive pile of federal debt, which, at $28 trillion, amounts to well over $200,000 per family.

Such reckless stimulus spending will impoverish the next generation. Yet, the fact is, the pandemic didn’t shut down the economy. Politicians did. Now they’re preening over their own generosity while piling up more debt that you, your kids, your grandkids and your great-grandkids will be paying off for decades to come.

Worse still, much of the Democrats’ “stimulus” bill will actually damage the economy.

For example, boosting the minimum wage sounds benevolent, but it will lead to unemployment for those with little education, training or skills. The Congressional Budget Office estimated it would kill 1.3 million jobs. It’s a war on the working poor.

Extended unemployment benefits likewise sound generous, but will encourage large numbers of people to stay home and avoid work. It’s a truism that paying people not to work boosts the number of unemployed. Yet, that’s what this bill does.

Helping fiscally troubled states is a huge mistake. Most are Blue States that have spent and taxed their way into trouble, and now want to use the pandemic as a cover for a bailout. It was bad policies by elected officials and bad decisions by voters that got these states into trouble, not the Chinese virus. Bailing out profligate states only encourages more of the same behavior.

And, sure, increased spending on schools sounds great, but that money won’t go to students. It will line greedy teachers unions’ pockets. Meanwhile, education standards and test scores will continue to slide as schools remain closed.

Instead of indiscriminately spending more money on bogus stimulus with checks for all, and irrelevant spending on Democrats’ far-left wish lists, we should target aid to the truly desperate and needy in our economy, those who were blindsided by some states’ destructive lockdowns and are now jobless.

OK, you say, but how do we stimulate growth, if not by government spending?

The simplest answer: Re-open the economy immediately. Rather than send $25 billion in “aid” to restaurants, let them open. Same with other small businesses.

Let’s take Democrats’ advice and follow science. A growing pile of studies show that virus lockdowns devastated the U.S. economy, with few or no offsetting health benefits. Only by reopening can we ensure solid growth. Phony stimulus gives people a check but not hope.

By the way, the government’s own data plainly show stimulus to be a waste. In a little noted report, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that for every $1 the government spent on COVID-19 “stimulus” during 2020, on average just 63 cents of economic activity was generated. That’s a negative return on a huge investment.

Call it what you want, it’s not stimulus. In fact, it’s a waste of money.

A recently released Rasmussen Poll shows that “a majority (59%) of voters say a new round of stimulus checks is necessary to help the country recover from the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Clearly, Americans have bought into the myth that the government can “stimulate” the economy. But it can’t. At least, not by wildly spending money. Real stimulus comes from low taxes, light regulation, the rule of law and strong protection of property rights. Anything else is just politics.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: checks; covid; relief; stimulus; themanofsteal; unclejoestolen
I've heard rumors gun control regulations were included. Does anyone have knowledge of this?
1 posted on 02/03/2021 10:04:13 PM PST by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: amorphous
 
 
Of course it's a grab bag of destructive trash - and president Demento will put his X mark on the signature line.
 
 

2 posted on 02/03/2021 10:09:13 PM PST by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lapsus calami

“Uncle Joe Stolen”


3 posted on 02/03/2021 10:23:36 PM PST by kiryandil (New Movie: The Assassination Of Ashli Babbitt By The Anonymous Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

” humiliate the Republicans, who foolishly took Biden and the Democrats at their word.”

Perhaps the Pubbie leadership should review the old Peanuts cartoons to see what the Dems are doing on a regular basis.


4 posted on 02/03/2021 10:32:07 PM PST by DaiHuy (May God save the country, for it is evident the people will not! Millard Fillmore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DaiHuy

They’ll just hold the football, and the Pubbies will run up and kick it...


5 posted on 02/03/2021 10:39:54 PM PST by kiryandil (New Movie: The Assassination Of Ashli Babbitt By The Anonymous Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
I heard they wanted to add it to the reconciliation but the two RAT Senators stated that they will emphatically vote against COVID relief if it includes Gun Control in reconciliation. I believe it was Manchin from WVA and Sinema out of AZ. That would kill the entire bill because you would have 52 votes against. I did not see if they simply want gun control as a stand alone bill forcing Senators and House members openly vote for gun control, a lot of RATS do not want their name attached to gun control legislation. Especially House members that have to start to campaign again in about 14 months.

I also believe they both said no to DC Statehood and any attempts to eliminate the filibuster. Although Manchin walked back a bit on the DC Statehood issue.

6 posted on 02/04/2021 12:34:41 AM PST by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angels will sing for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Pubbies need to vote know in a bloc on each and every bill these aholes push. Like da dumbles do/did.

Not that that will happen.


7 posted on 02/04/2021 3:40:49 AM PST by Adder ("Can you be more stupid?" is a question, not a challenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

“Republicans seek checks of $1,000, but would exclude families with more than $50,000 in income from the handouts.”

If you are going to tax us in order to hand out money, it better be for everyone. The republicans are more socialist than the democrats on this one. How about no stimulus plan at all—allow capitalism to work.


8 posted on 02/04/2021 5:04:54 AM PST by VinnieCCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

9 posted on 02/04/2021 5:29:31 AM PST by Red Badger (SLEAZIN' is the REASON for the TREASON .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Lol, thanks! I needed a good laugh this mornin’...


10 posted on 02/04/2021 8:28:42 AM PST by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VinnieCCT
If you are going to tax us in order to hand out money, it better be for everyone. The republicans are more socialist than the democrats on this one. How about no stimulus plan at all—allow capitalism to work.

Hey VinnieC. How are you doing?

Some families are really struggling & we need to get some money to them. Unfortunately we've already spent a lot of money & we're way into the red ink on this. So we need to cut costs. Well-to-do households that are simply going to bank the money don't need it. The only question here should be, "How do we distinguish those who need the money from those who don't?"

The author proposed a very arbitrary line of $50,000 but this is way too simplistic. Anybody making over $50K up to a limit of $100K should also qualify, if they can show some kind of substantial financial hardship in the past year, such as the breadwinner losing his job, or getting his hours cut.

This is the way to get money to families who really need it bad & at the same time, not bankrupting the US government. We are already standing at $28 trillion in debt & I don't want to make it $29 trillion today.

I wouldn't be getting a check either way. Your "give it to everybody" plan would give me a check but it would drive America deeper into debt. I don't want that & I'm prepared to make this small sacrifice. I hope you are too, Vinnie. Have a great weekend.

11 posted on 02/05/2021 8:25:27 AM PST by Bryan ( The Democrats are bankrupting this country, one welfare check at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson