Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth Will Drill with Japanese in Pacific During Deployment
US Naval Institute News ^ | 3 February 2021 | Sam LaGrone

Posted on 02/07/2021 7:00:58 AM PST by Army Air Corps

The Royal Navy’s flagship HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08) is set to drill with Japanese maritime forces in the Pacific during its maiden deployment this spring, the U.K. Ministry of Defense announced on Wednesday.

In the readout of a call between defense and foreign ministers from Tokyo and London, the two countries discussed the deployment and the U.K. Royal Navy’s plans to operate with the Japan Self-Defense Forces during the U.K. Carrier Strike Group 2021 deployment.

“Japan and the U.K. have forged a close defense and security partnership that is being elevated to new heights this year when the U.K. Carrier Strike Group visits the Indo-Pacific,” U.K. Defense Secretary Ben Wallace said in a statement about the call, which also included Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab.

“We will take security and defense cooperation between Japan and the U.K. to a higher level,” Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi said in a statement about the call, which also included defense minister Nobuo Kishi, according to Nikkei Asia.

The confirmation of the exercises between the two maritime forces comes as Japan and the U.K. have increased defense cooperation. The two have cooperated in hunting North Korean ships operating illegally and in 2019 entered into a trilateral naval cooperation agreement with the U.S.

The drills also come as China has continued to expand maritime operations and taken a more assertive posture in the East and South China Seas. In response to Beijing’s military expansion, over the last few years Japan has adjusted its pacifist constitution to allow for more multilateral cooperation. The military has since drawn closer to the U.S., Australia and the U.K.

Japan, the U.S. Marines and U.K. all operate F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters. When Queen Elizabeth deploys this year, its air wing will include F-35Bs from as “The Wake Island Avengers” of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 211 as well as F-35Bs from Royal Air Force’s 617 Squadron “The Dambusters.” Last year, Japan began converting its two 24,000-ton Izumo-class helicopter destroyers to operate F-35Bs and also requested Marines squadrons to deploy aboard the Japanese ships.

Last month, the U.S. and U.K. formalized their own agreement to deploy together as part of CSG 21. In addition to the Wake Island Avengers, the strike group will include U.S. destroyer USS The Sullivans (DDG-68) along with Royal Navy escorts.

The CSG21 underway will be the first U.K. carrier deployment of fixed-wing jets in a decade.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: japan; royalnavy

1 posted on 02/07/2021 7:00:58 AM PST by Army Air Corps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Had a chance to see her in person once.

She was a lot smaller than I expected.


2 posted on 02/07/2021 7:08:39 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

US carriers are very large. Other carriers? Not so much.


3 posted on 02/07/2021 7:21:34 AM PST by ClearCase_guy ("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Why should they spend the money on larger, this is just a pretty dress, looks good at that’s it, see we made an effort! The big guns are left to us as always


4 posted on 02/07/2021 7:24:41 AM PST by ronnie raygun ( Massive mistakes are made by arrogant fools; massive evils are committed by evil people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

> She was a lot smaller than I expected. <

Well, you can’t completely fund a welfare state and still have money left over for large warships. And I say that knowing the US is going down that same path.


5 posted on 02/07/2021 7:26:03 AM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I assume you’ve also seen a U.S. fleet carrier?

That’s probably why. A Nimitz displaces more than 1.5 times a QE, carries ~2.5X the aircraft.


6 posted on 02/07/2021 7:26:37 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun
this is just a pretty dress, looks good at that’s it, see we made an effort!

I don't know. I'd take their help any day.

7 posted on 02/07/2021 7:39:39 AM PST by libertylover (This is not your Founding Fathers' United States of America anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I have always thought from an appearance perspective, British warships lack the beautiful lines I like to see in a vessel. Doesn't mean they don't function...just means they don't appeal to my eye.

She is no exception. Sorry to say, I find her somewhat homely.

Granted, some of our more recent vessels are no better lookin (Case in point, the Zumwalt class and the San Antonio class), but hey...now the USN will allow sailors of both sexes to paint their fingernails now, so...that makes up for it...right?

Though I must say, a little dazzle camo can make even the most ungainly ship appear warlike, as in this Photoshop I did: Before:

After::


8 posted on 02/07/2021 7:53:05 AM PST by rlmorel ("I’d rather enjoy a risky freedom than a safe servitude." Robby Dinero, USMC Veteran, Gym Owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Its 65-75% of the size of a US supercarrier, when you compare them from above, the size difference isn’t really that striking.

https://www.reddit.com/r/WarshipPorn/comments/9v1nqp/uss_nimitz_and_hms_queen_elizabeth_lengtharea/


9 posted on 04/30/2021 7:25:10 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson