Posted on 02/23/2021 5:18:40 AM PST by marktwain
I have done investigations. This was brilliantly done and documented.
and fell upon non believers and deaf ears, also Zimmerman being latino was paraded around as a racist white man
This. And people get on me for calling out crap blogs like 19FortyFive and Am Shooting Journal.
Some time ago Chris Rock did a great video called "How Not To Get Your A$$ Kicked By The Police".It was still on youtube recently...don't know if they've taken it down. He also did a great piece in a concert once that is called "I Love Black People,But I Hate Niggaz".
I wonder if he still stands by them.
Thank you!!
How many of these hoaxes have we had? The MSM perpetuates these lies and it is amazing to me how many people believe it.
The latest being the G Floyd lie.
Bookmarking
I have it, bought it when it came out, and it is one of many in a long list of why I would NEVER BELIEVE ANYTHING ANY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE or PRESSTUTUTE SAYS
You only needed to watch the trial to see what a farce it was. The prosecution was exposed as fraudulent during every phase of the trial.
Bump for later.
Zimmerman - portrayed as a racist white man when he was actually a Latino... I seem to remember that George Z also had one black great-grandfather.
Why didn’t Brittany Diamond Eugene live with her biological mother? How was she connected to the woman who texted about Diamond, referring to her as her daughter?
Secondly, would it have made any difference if Brittany Diamond, rather than her half-sister, had testified? George Z got off because of gun shot forensics, not Rachel’s testimony.
BOOKbump
Secondly, would it have made any difference if Brittany Diamond, rather than her half-sister, had testified? George Z got off because of gun shot forensics, not Rachel’s testimony.
To question 1. I do not know, but it may be worthy of discovery and investigation.
to question 2. Brittany Diamond would not testify, most likely, because she was not willing to perjure herself, thereby subjecting herself to prosecution.
Also, if she were to testify it would have opened her up to cross examination. Her duplicity about her sexual relationships would have become apparent.
Her dumping of Trayvon, just before he attacked Zimmerman, would have become apparent.
Her relationships with Crump, Matt Gutman, and Sabrina Martin would have been exposed. She very likely would be the key to unraveling the plot to make the Trayvon case into a campaign to activate the Black community for a second term of President Obama.
Without the "girlfriend" testimony, there was no case against Zimmerman.
The choice was to take a chance with Rachel Eugene, or essentially fold.
The conspirators had to promote a false witness to protect their lies.
But Rachel was so flawed. How come the defense didn’t tear into her mumbling inconsistencies? Rachel was functionally illiterate and couldn’t have texted squat to anybody. Surely a lawyer could see that she was being led by the prosecutors and Crump, in the deposition if not the oral testimony in court. Why no objections to make her clean up her perjury?
Her inconsistencies, IMHO, were a large part of what swayed to jurors to acquit.
The defense attorneys did not need to do more, and they always were at risk of appearing to attack an obviously struggling "witness".
There is video of Rachel, attempting to confess her role to prosecution interviewers.
The interviewers would not listen.
Remember the whole establishment was invested in finding Zimmerman guilty, mostly because of fear of the Media and of being called "racist".
Joel shows, with his investigation and evidence, the conspiracy and the willingness to lie to the court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.