Yes, it is true that evidence of fraud is the important thing. But the credibility of said evidence will always be judged on its source.
Both Powell and Giulliani went on television multiple times making claims—and as we see they are being sued for defamation for those claims.
Many of those claims were NOT opinions or legal theories, but rather statements that can be verified as true or false.
Smartmatic has filed suit against both Powell and Giulliani, claiming that their software was used in one county (Los Angeles County, CA) during the Nov 2020 election. That is a statement that can be verified or debunked.
They also claim that their software is not used on Dominion voting machines. Again, that is true or not true.
The Secretary of State office in each state has to make public its election logistics, including which companies have be awarded contracts for equipment and software in every election.
This can be a useful link too: www.verifiedvoting.com/
It keeps track of what type of voting/tabulation equipment and software is being used where, and if you can’t find on their site which companies’ products are being used where.they give you the link to the Secretary of State office for each state, and the information can be either found on the website or obtained through phone calls and emails.
Smartmatic has a VERY strong case against Powell, because, it appears... she lied. And if they take her down with their suit, it will lend more credibility to the other law suits that have been filed on this matter—including Dominion’s.
We should have gotten someone better to make the case that needed to be made.
What was her lie?