To: BenLurkin
The government did not follow through with their stated purpose of seizing the land via eminent domain.
7 posted on
04/09/2021 6:43:06 PM PDT by
Meatspace
To: Meatspace
11 posted on
04/09/2021 6:45:37 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: Meatspace
The government did not follow through with their stated purpose of seizing the land via eminent domain. See Kelo v City of New London. The Supreme court ruled that the city could take the land. The land has set unused ever since New London took it.
51 posted on
04/10/2021 2:33:38 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson