Posted on 04/10/2021 6:48:18 AM PDT by Kaslin
The federal Veterans Administration (VA) leadership had negotiated free data (not counted against anyone’s wireless data cap) with all major providers for an app called VA Video Connection. This allows veterans nationwide to access telemedicine for appointments, counseling, and other critical services digitally, even when they have lower cost plans with limited data levels. This app is very data intensive, as most high-end streaming video conferencing programs are. The service would be way outside the cost capability of many lower income vets without the deal made by the VA. Sadly, under a new law, passed in 2018, but put into effect last month, the deal is now illegal, putting the app out of reach of our most at risk vets.
When the FCC repealed the Obama Administration’s net neutrality rule in 2018, California immediately passed their own. The general idea of net neutrality is to keep broadband providers from fiddling with traffic (slowing speeds as you approach your plan’s caps, giving priority speed to some content providers over others, etc.). It also explicitly prohibited an action known as zero rating. This exempts certain content from counting against your plan’s data. If there is no free data allowed in California (the new law specifically prohibits it), the vast majority of vets will not be able afford access to VA Video Connection. It is simply would eat up all their data without the free access.
Progressives, instead of admitting they had hurriedly created another poor-quality law that had major negative consequences, immediately countered that there was no problem here; carriers could just be given an exemption in this case. Except, most carriers operate across state lines, and they service customers who move about between states. All this puts an enormous administrative burden on the carriers, one which has potential severe legal penalties if they get it wrong. So, which set of lawyers do corporate boards listen to, lazy lawmakers, or their own legal departments? Facing a process that is costly, complicated and carries legal liabilities, they will go with their lawyers every time.
Most providers are planning to simply drop their various free data programs nationwide, in anticipation of more progressive-led states moving in the same direction as California. A Wall Street Journal editorial recently noted that AT&T for example was dropping their very popular zero rate deal for HBO Max Video service (an AT&T owned entity) all across the country. Despite the powerful incentive this provides, driving customers in both directions, the practice has been rendered illegal by California. They are also trying to look out into the near future and they see a strong possibility that the Biden Administration might reinstate the Obama rules everywhere. Is it worth running afoul of fines and penalties, regardless of intent? Lazy lawmakers say yes, corporate law offices say no. Again, whose advice would you follow?
Back to the plight of the vets. The Biden Administration smells a train wreck coming. They are engaging with California officials and the VA to try and find a fix. Sadly, the best answer is unlikely to be on the table.
The California net neutrality law should be dumped, and any nationwide version should stay in the scrap heap it landed in back in 2018. The marketplace should be allowed to work this out. The law was passed because it was a darling cause célèbre of the Left. The progressives wanted to punish companies for being profitable, and because they see animus in any decision that corporate boards make which benefit their shareholders (their legal duty by the way).
The previous free data agreements with the VA are evidence that Internet Service Providers can, and will, make altruistic decisions, even ones that cost them some profit. Now, as progressives thump their chests and claim a victory over corporate evildoers, the only ones hurt are low-income customers, and vets on top of that.
Laws are not for virtue signaling. Lawmakers should do their homework before passing legislation, not demand that corporations pay high costs and run legal dangers to mitigate the unintended consequences of poorly crafted laws. Band-Aid, after the fact solutions should not be the answer; passing good, well researched laws is. The California net neutrality law is not an effective measure. Drop it now, allow our low-income veterans to continue to access their health care.
I don’t how but this sounds like BS too me:
>>If there is no free data allowed in California (the new law specifically prohibits it), the vast majority of vets will not be able afford access to VA Video Connection
Really? the ‘vast majority’ of vets...somehow I doubt it.
Comcast and At&T are both huge Democratic donors. Remind me again why we care about their profits?
I think that means there is no way to police where the data is bring requested. So all states are effected and no one has free access. Thus, the vast majority who do not live in CA are shut out.
It is more important that incels who haven’t left Mom’s basement in 10 years have low latency and high frame rates for video games than it is for vets to access medical care.
“I think that means there is no way to police where the data is bring requested.”
For a long time carriers have let subscribers use certain services without it counting against data caps. Apparently, net neutrality in CA means that they cannot do this anymore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.