Skip to comments.
House Democrat Campaign Chief Failed to Report Thousands in Stock Trades
breitbart ^
| 12 Apr 2021
| MATTHEW BOYLE
Posted on 04/12/2021 2:06:19 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: MarvinStinson
"All the investigations in the world won't feed a hungry child."
— Bill Clinton
2
posted on
04/12/2021 2:09:08 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: MarvinStinson
Hey, dontcha know, democrats don’t have to follow no stinkin rules or laws, especially democrat politicians.
3
posted on
04/12/2021 2:09:56 PM PDT
by
falcon99
(qu)
To: MarvinStinson
House Democrat Campaign Chief Failed to Report Thousands in Stock TradesSomehow, Trump is at fault for this.
4
posted on
04/12/2021 2:10:18 PM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Celebrate Decivilization)
To: MarvinStinson
By and large, Dems are dishonest.
But 11K in inherited stock is a nothing burger. It doesn’t signify corruption or influence, IMHO.
To: Steely Tom
"All the investigations in the world won't feed a hungry child."
— Bill Clinton
BUT THEY MIGHT CATCH A CROOK
To: MarvinStinson
So what . . . you can marry your brother, delete 30,000 emails, and sleep with a Chinese spy, and nothing's gonna' happen, because they're
DEMORATS!Nuthin' to see here . . . move on . . .
7
posted on
04/12/2021 2:14:49 PM PDT
by
laweeks
(Just wait till you have to have a biopsy from your prostate, now that is an experience you will neve)
To: MarvinStinson
That’s not much of an inheritance.
8
posted on
04/12/2021 2:15:44 PM PDT
by
HIDEK6
(God bless Donald Trump. )
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
“House Democrats chose an incompetent crook to lead their campaign arm,” NRCC spokeswoman Samantha Bullock said.
9
posted on
04/12/2021 2:16:10 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: Steely Tom
“All the investigations in the world won’t feed a hungry child.”
***
and neither will a baker’s dozen of bl*w j*bs. (.^ quack
To: MarvinStinson
“$11,051.”
And the supposed wrongdoing is just not reporting it. Not that it’s ill gotten gains.
Seriously. You’d better have more than this to move the needle on anyone’s outrage meter.
To: MarvinStinson
$11,000 dollars of stacks that trade at an average of between $150 and $250 a share hardly amounts to a “significant” number of shares. How petty can people get? His mother died and willed it to him. The value of the inheritance is only slightly above the value of a non-reportable gift for crying out loud.
12
posted on
04/12/2021 2:22:24 PM PDT
by
7thOF7th
(Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
To: MarvinStinson
Every DemonRAT is a criminal. Every one.
It’s a characteristic of the criminal mind. When criminals take over an area they push all of the honest people out and fill the area with other criminals. This is what happened to the DemonRATs and the FBI, ATF, etc. Only criminals are allowed in high positions. No one decent with a conscience is allowed.
13
posted on
04/12/2021 2:35:28 PM PDT
by
Seruzawa
(The political Left is the Garden of Eden of Incompetence - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: MarvinStinson; All
14
posted on
04/12/2021 2:36:15 PM PDT
by
HotHunt
To: MarvinStinson
Silly Breitbart. He’s a Democrat therefor he cannot be guilty.
To: Pearls Before Swine
According to the author it’s significant. What a tool.
16
posted on
04/12/2021 2:43:22 PM PDT
by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(The veil of civilization is only 9 meals thick. )
To: MarvinStinson
Since WHEN have Democrats ever been held accountable for breaking the law?
To: MarvinStinson
Really, people. This is five and dime, and probably forgotten in the wake of losing a mother.
There’s plenty of seven, eight, and nine figure corruption out in the open already.
18
posted on
04/12/2021 3:16:35 PM PDT
by
The Antiyuppie
(When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.)
To: HIDEK6
That’s not much of an inheritance.
—
That’s what I thought. 11K? Eh. There are way bigger fish to fry.
19
posted on
04/12/2021 3:31:21 PM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(“Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.”)
To: MarvinStinson
...a potential violation of federal law. It's a "potential" violation of federal law because he's a Democrat.
It would have been an absolute violation of federal law if he were a Republican, and an ethics charge would have been filed immediately.
-PJ
20
posted on
04/12/2021 3:34:20 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson