Posted on 04/23/2021 8:50:05 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), the lone senator to vote against an Asian hate crimes bill on Thursday, said he could not approve the measure because the wording of the legislation was too broad and would infringe on the First Amendment.
On Thursday, the Senate approved 94-1 the measure that would combat violence against Asian-Americans and Pacific islanders during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The measure would allow for more police resources to be dedicated to hate crimes against Asian people by creating expanded reporting for the crimes. It would also create a position within the Department of Justice (DOJ) to review hate crimes across the country.
But according to Hawley in a tweet, the bill “turns the federal government into the speech police” and “gives [the] government sweeping authority to decide what counts as offensive speech and then monitor it.”
In an interview with Fox News, the Republican senator said, “It’s too broad. As a former prosecutor, my view is it’s dangerous to simply give the federal government open-ended authority to define a whole new class of federal hate crime incidents.”
Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), a sponsor of the bill, said the measure would “send a clear message of support and solidarity” while Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who amended the bill, added that “crimes motivated by bias against race, national origin, and other characteristics cannot be tolerated.”
The House is moving to pass a similar bill that can be signed into law by President Joe Biden.
According to data from nonprofit Stop AAPI Hate, there were 3,795 incidents reported from March 19, 2020, to Feb. 28, 2021. Verbal harassment accounted for 68 percent of all reports, while physical assaults made up just over 11 percent. The report contains firsthand accounts that detail the use of racial slurs and instances of shunning.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
Of course, the Communist Party of China (CCP) is very clever.
The Chinese regime has weaponized racism by conflating criticisms of the CCP with discrimination against Chinese people.
The CCP hasn’t hesitated in exploiting the recent narrative to push its own propaganda and to further divide the United States, according to scholars, human rights activists, and journalists.
The report contains firsthand accounts that detail the use of racial slurs and instances of shunning.
The near sole source of any anti-asian bigotry is from blacks and elite universities.
Isn't this already covered in the myriad of laws already on the books.
Does this cover Native Americans or are they going to need a bill?
I’ll say it again, Hate is a Motive, it isn’t a Crime.
Hate Crime is Thought Crime, period...
First, the only power that the states have expressly constitutionally given to the feds to dictate race protection policy is limited to voting rights issues, evidenced by the 15th Amendment.
"15th Amendment: Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Also, consider that probably most of the Civil Rights act of 1964 and its titles are based on stolen state powers imo.
Next, given the bill deals with domestic violence, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention established constitutional safeguards against unwanted federal involvement in domestic violence. The delegates did so by limiting the feds to respond only to such violence upon official application for assistance from a given state, evidenced by Section 4 of Article IV.
"Article IV, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence [emphasis added]."
In fact, Justice Joseph Story had explained that the reason for state application in Section 4 is, in my words, so that desperate Democrats cannot use domestic violence, especially violence manufactured by Democrats, as an excuse to stick their big noses into the affairs of the sovereign states.
"§ 1819. It may not be amiss further to observe, (in the language of another commentator,) that every pretext for intermeddling with the domestic concerns of any state, under colour of protecting it against domestic violence, is taken away by that part of the provision, which renders an application from the legislature, or executive authority of the state endangered necessary to be made to the general government, before its interference can be at all proper [emphasis added]. On the other hand, this article becomes an immense acquisition of strength, and additional force to the aid of any state government, in case of an internal rebellion, or insurrection against its authority. The southern states, being more peculiarly open to danger from this quarter, ought (he adds) to be particularly tenacious of a constitution, from which they may derive such assistance in the most critical periods." —Justice Joseph Story, Article 4, Section 4.
Corrections, insights welcome.
To put a stop to unconstitutional federal government overreach in domestic violence, and anything else the unconstitutionally big federal government overreaches its very limited powers on, patriots need to do the following. They need to primary (2022) federal and state lawmakers who don’t agree to do the following federal action based on stolen state powers.
When the federal government accuses someone of violating a law, judges and law enforcement officials should be required to do this.
Judges and law-enforcement officials need to inform the accused of the constitutional clause(s) that arguably justifies the allegedly broken law for further scrutiny of the constitutionality of that law, especially where unconstitutional federal peacetime gun control laws are concerned imo.
President Pedo Joe:
“No Amendment is absolute. C’mon, man.”
Haley is the only sane one. Crimes should have identical punishment regardless of race, ethnicity, skin color, whatever.
Better find all the Mr.: Chan, Wong, and Moto films you can before they are banned!!
White folk still waiting.............
As I’ve posted on this blog for the umpteenth time, in what is left of the now-defunct former USA, the Constitution is a dead letter, the Bill of Rights is no longer in force, and the Rule of Law is over. US courts are a sham and the US judicial system is a farce. It makes no difference whatsoever to argue at the bar before a corrupted bench what the Constitution requires. Lawfare today is a sucker’s bet in a rigged game. And the GOPee voted for it! GOPee Delenda Est!
Hate crime laws are bogus Marxist BS
He’s got logic but it was still a fool’s errand.
Interesting and valid point I had not considered- thanks.
Let me get this straight. You can call a white, Christian, straight, republican male anything you want, including “white supremacist” or “terrorist.” And that appears to be acceptable. But if you similarly berate someone with a dark skin color, that is considered to be a crime?
🙄
It was all predictable as soon as the very first “hate crimes” law was enacted - the REAL target has always been the use the law to control speech and by controlling speech you control thought by efforts to eliminate from public view the expression of any “illegal” speech (thought, idea).
ALL hate crime bills should be voided on First Amendment grounds.
This Orwellian Unconstitutional “Hate Crime” crappola should have been nipped in the bud by the Courts years ago.
I can’t believe what has happened to a Nation conceived on the principle of Individual Freedom. We are living the last scene from the original Planet of the Apes Movie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.