Did Kemp do that, or did Johnny Isakson do that by retiring when he did -- and forcing the governor to replace him on an interim basis until the special election?
Kemp appointed a very rich campaign donor that everyone knew couldn’t win.
We can’t see in their minds but I have to think Isakson and Kemp did all this on purpose.
Isakson did not have to retire when he did. Kemp did not have to appoint a sure loser. But both happened with knowledge of the most likely outcome.