Posted on 05/09/2021 1:22:10 PM PDT by Hostage
So...labeling this as nonsense that will be summarily denied is premature. There’s as much likelihood that my dog sings the national anthem as that this gets anywhere.
“We must realize that election rigging is not a 2020 happening. It was going on before 2020. Many persons in elected offices are there by fraud.”
I agree I think as crappy a president as he would have been, Mitt Romney did defeat Obama in 2012.
Thanks Hostage.
NO ONE here could understand Juan’s continued re-election and that last minute vote to prevent the repeal of obamacare was unprecedented !
My first thought was, lots of luck, the court will not know what “Quo Warranto” means, having missed that week in law school.
Proof of our “Justice System,” being compromised?
Look no further than former AG Eric Holder, a man who was a scofflaw in college and had never considered being a law abiding AG!
This should be an interesting case to follow, if it develops legs.
yes. i believe it’s been going on since the tea party shocked the uniparty in 2010.
they just kicked it up to full scale in 2020.
Both Barnett and Woods lost by huge margins in 2020. That’s going to make them look like “sore losers” to the court. I give them slightly less chance than the proverbial snowball in hell.
“I agree I think as crappy a president as he would have been, Mitt Romney did defeat Obama in 2012.”
I cannot escape that conclusion as well. The Romney/Ryan crowds were near MAGA like in certain areas. Obama was a whipped puppy in the debates.... “Can you help me out Candy?”
I think Soros has been putting the strategic pieces in place for many moons to shape the outcomes of our elections to his liking.
L
:
......in a Quo Warranto claim, “standing” is not an issue and cannot be considered. Anybody walking up or down the street can make this claim regardless of whether or not he has a direct interest in the case. When he/she does, he/she is considered a “demandant” not a plaintiff which legally has it’s own meaning too lengthy to go into here.
Only two things can happen. They are there’s a trial or there is not a trial. If there is not a trial, the demandant wins and these office holders must vacate. To stay in office, these named office holders will have to win at trial.
Other points:
1. burden of proof is on the respondents, not the demandant
2. if the court of jurisdiction refuses to hold a trial, the office holders must vacate
3. a writ of Quo Warranto is called a “prerogative” writ which means it goes to the head of the line on the court of jurisdictions docket
4. Enforcement: All such writs are enforceable by the people which could be the sheriff.
Now, with respect to our Judiciary, we all know it’s corrupt and anything can happen but the foregoing is, essentially, what is supposed to happen. Under NORMAL circumstances, this filing is VERY SERIOUS for these office holders. But, the marxists are in control at the moment so we will see.
later
Excuse my flippancy but we have so frequently seen all our institutions dodging their responsibilities that I have little confidence in a rational outcome. There would appear to be no consequences for our government institutions to blatantly refuse to carry out their duty.
Please Lord!!!
I agree, 0bama acted very surprised when he won
the problem with #4 is that the sheriff is one of those named
Not a snowballs chance in hell a court will hear. It will be dismissed for lack of standing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.