To: Hostage
presenting a Quo Warranto to a corrupt court or supreme court is novel, but you know there will be a ruling of moot or no standing.
Which means the entire judiciary is beyond broke.
It is insignificant, as the attempt.
It makes the fact that the judiciary lacks standing to deliver an opinion.
17 posted on
05/09/2021 2:00:22 PM PDT by
SERE_DOC
( The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. TJ)
To: SERE_DOC
Traitor Roberts sayz:
“No standing”
“No damage beforehand”
“”Done deal”, too late after”
19 posted on
05/09/2021 2:03:23 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(CAPILITAZATION? Don't ask.....)
To: SERE_DOC
My first thought was, lots of luck, the court will not know what “Quo Warranto” means, having missed that week in law school.
Proof of our “Justice System,” being compromised?
Look no further than former AG Eric Holder, a man who was a scofflaw in college and had never considered being a law abiding AG!
26 posted on
05/09/2021 2:39:57 PM PDT by
BatGuano
("Ya don't think that I'd go into combat with change in my pocket, do Ya?)
To: SERE_DOC
presenting a Quo Warranto to a corrupt court or supreme court is novel, but you know there will be a ruling of moot or no standing.
Which means the entire judiciary is beyond broke.
It is insignificant, as the attempt.
It makes the fact that the judiciary lacks standing to deliver an opinion.
My concern is that judiciary will now invalidate the AZ senate elections as a way to stop the audit, although that isn't part of this action.
Since the petition alleges that recent elections were illegal, that means that at least Ducey's last two appointments to the AZ Supreme Court will need to recuse themselves, since the allegations are that they weren't lawfully appointed...
45 posted on
05/09/2021 8:10:16 PM PDT by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson