That excerpt is, at best, incoherent.
Kindly coherent yourself to the article.
I’d say something about this quack, but I think this video expresses my opinion better :
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=edIi6hYpUoQ
I found the article to be coherent, right up to the point she brought in the 5G theory. But discounting that detour, one has to wonder about what happens to all those spike proteins.
You’re too kind.
“protein lasts longer”? Apropos of WTF point is she trying to make?
I had a hard time with it, but I’m only a lowly family practitioner of 30 years, with more than a passing interest in virology, infectious disease, allergy/immunology.
Just a note here, in case such a scenario should arise: Back in the dark ages of pre-molecular biology the “central tenet” of biology was DNA produces RNA which produces PROTEIN.
Stanley Prusiner tuned that on its head when he proved that the several spongiform encephalopathies such as Kuru, CJD (and BSE, Scrapie) were caused by PRotein Infections OrgaNisms: PRIONs.
I’ve got a pet theory that injecting synthetic mRNA (keep in mind, NO organic chemical process is 100% accurate, I can guaran-freaking-tee you SOME of those mRNA strands are NOT exact copies of the desired spike protein epitope mRNA) into a living organism MAY have as disastrous down-stream unpredictable results as the PRIONs have.
When some outside stimulus calls for a cell to produce a protein, DNA is transcribed into an mRNA strand (several of them) and sent to the endoplasmic reticulum of the cell where Ribosomes transcribe the mRNA into proteins which are used in the cell, or sent OUT of the cell.
What mechanisms SUPPRESS the DNA transcription process? Negative feedback from the mRNA concentration? The end-product inhibiting signals leading to their production.
I don’t know. It’s been 30+ years since I took molecular biology at UCSD under the tutelage of some awesome professors/staff.
So artificial mRNA is brought into cells to produce proteins, what shuts off the production?
What happens to the “mutant” proteins produced by the inaccurate mRNA copies out of the lab?
We’ll know in a few years for sure. You heard it here first
Oh, and don’t think the single-stranded DNA of the J&J vaccine is benign either.
Experimental. Investigational. Emergency Use Authorization.
I’ve had COVID19, as did my wife. Decades in the Army, combat zones, incoming rounds in our helicopters from Khmer rouge ‘92-’93, mine fields, incoming mortar rounds to our camp, I NEVER felt closer to dying than the month I was sick with the ‘rona. My wife was hospitalized, it was horrible.
That said, I would NEVER get any of the vaccines for it and, as I’ve already HAD the virus, studies are showing that’s as good (better) than the vaccine.
This coherent enough?
From the International Journal of Vaccination Theory, Practice, and Research
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/36
-There has been considerable chatter on the Internet about the possibility of vaccinated people causing disease in unvaccinated people in close proximity. While this may seem hard to believe, there is a plausible process by which it could occur through the release of exosomes from dendritic cells in the spleen containing misfolded spike proteins, in complex with other prion reconformed proteins. These exosomescan travel to distant places. It is not impossible to imagine that they are being released from the lungs and inhaled by a nearby person. Extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, have been detected in sputum, mucus, epithelial lining fluid, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in association with respiratory diseases (Lucchetti et al., 2021).A Phase 1/2/3 study undertaken by BioNTech on the Pfizer mRNA vaccine implied in their study protocol that they anticipated the possibility of secondary exposure to the vaccine (BioNTech, 2020). The protocol included the requirement that “exposure during pregnancy” should be reported by the study participants. They then gave examples of “environmental exposure during pregnancy” which included exposure “to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.” They even suggested two levels of indirect exposure: “A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior toor around the time of conception.
No, THIS is incoherent:
“GOP-invited Ohio doctor Sherri Tenpenny falsely tells Ohio lawmakers COVID-19 shots ‘magnetize’ people, create 5G ‘interfaces’”