Posted on 05/29/2021 1:03:28 PM PDT by Mariner
Just a minor point:
Before the radical feminization of the USN during the 90’s and beyond, monthly periods were never a problem...
See my post #60.
9/11 was worse than anything another civilization (s) could throw at us? Yeah, gotcha.
Or they are coming clean with what they are seeing.
2D imagery doesn’t hack it, even if its subject matter is in motion.
People jumping out of a building on fire and splattering into jelly when they hit? That was kinda rough to me. The media tried to whitewash it as much as possible, but the endless 911 calls about burning, suffocating, and dying in real time are pretty hard to compare to *recorded* stuff.
All those officers and crews were suffering mass delusions over and entire month, at the same time and amazingly it was all the same delusion. See there scientifically explained I used the scientific method to explain what I could and dismissed the rest of it out right. It’s clear that all our military personnel are suffering from mental issues. The whole thing has been completely explained and is just as far fetched as the crux of the story, but it’s explained scientifically.
I’m not convinced but I am not willing to dismiss and not follow the evidence where it leads not where the “scientist” want it to go.
I suspect the deep state will come out and declare these are drones of some type doing 13000 knots without coming apart and burning up. The scientist will do as they are told and accept the explanation to keep the government $$$ flowing.
“Just BS to take the focus off the disaster at our Southern Border. The democrats (Read: Communists) are masters at deception.”
Or the vaccine, or gas prices, or voter fraud, or the housing bubble, or the overvalued stock market, etc, etc. Dealer’s choice.
The liue wiull be something like that! [see my profile page for blog link to the latest essay on the topic]
The Navy has said, consistently, they do not know what they are. Several Youtubers have given great explanations of all of the recently released videos.
Hopefully the Navy will read the Youtubers’ explanations and then they’ll know.
I agree they’re most likely fallen angels.
—
Just because we don’t know what they are, why assume they’re evil? If God created the Earth and the Heavens then he crested these beings too, if they’re from another world.
They're not. They're not even in US airspace / waters. I'm not sure how this notion has been widely circulated, if it's just bad reporting or simple misunderstanding by people who aren't pilots or seaman. Thus far, all of these publicly acknowledged incidents - starting with the Nimitz incident in 2004 - have occurred in international waters; generally anything beyond the 12-mile sovereign limit is considered international water.
Some of these areas have been designated 'military operations areas.' What does that mean? Nothing really. Mariners and airman are still free to use these geographical tracts of sea and airspace, but they're warned that they do so at their own risk. It would be a violation of maritime law to prohibit the transiting of these areas because, as I said, they're technically international waters.
"Try flying your Cessna near a US Navy ship and see what happens.
This gets a bit more complicated, but the short story is: Nothing is going to happen to the Cessna presuming the ship is more than 12-miles from the US coastline. If it's an American-registered aircraft, the FAA has the authority to issue fines/sanctions against the pilot no matter where the airplane is operating, in US airspace, international airspace or foreign sovereign airspace. As a condition of having a US pilot's license and/or operating a US-flagged aircraft, you're always subject to the jurisdiction of the FAA. If the plane were to encroaching upon the perceived airspace of the ship itself (certainly at the 10NM range), the most likely outcome would be a sternly worded radio message and maybe a 'friendly' fly-by from a fixed or rotary wing naval aircraft. This is why during the cold war (and even still today), Russians used to buzz our ships at sea with regularity and without incident.
Interestingly, what constitutes 'the airspace of the ship at sea' is a murky, unsettled question. At the end of the, the control of the airspace over the carrier/carrier group is determined by who has the most firepower. But, it does go some way towards explaining why the US has never attempted to shoot one of these things down. First, it's irresponsible to shoot at something you can't positively identify and doesn't pose an imminent threat. If the Russian or Chinese had a craft that could loiter for hours in the shadow of a US naval ship, there's nothing the Captain of the ship could do about it, legally. This is why being a Captain of a US Navy ship is an unforgiving job. You have to follow the rules right up until the moment where you can't anymore and hope that doesn't put you in prison.
I’m sorry you have so many ignorant people pontificating on this thread.
Yeah, it’s not what you think it is. There’s isn’t a huge floating mass of debris in the pacific ocean. Instead, there are ‘gyres’ in every (tidal) body of water that junk collects in because of prevailing currents, which are often circular in nature. When people say ‘garbage patch’ they’re referencing one of these gyres. I believe the Pacific ocean has several gyres.
Uh huh. Look at the squirrel!
Because everything is limited by the speed of light, as far as we know—except for Democrats’ stupidity, which knows know bounds...
Reducing our great military to sounding like cats chasing a laser pointer. Biden’s America.
They’re everywhere, even here.
I remember when FLIR was first mounted in a pod on our planes back in the mid-late Seventies.
It was a big deal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.