But even without politics, if prosecutors get their name in print, get a book deal, and land a cushy job at the Brookings Institution or a big law firm, does it matter if the gambit succeeds or fails? Democrats spent four years trying various attacks on Trump with no chance of winning.
Would prosecutors bluff witnesses and defendants? I’ve seen it many times. Vance could be trying to squeeze witnesses to cooperate by bluffing that he has a stronger case than he really does. The media gambit could be to flush quail out of the bushes.
How do I know that the prosecutors do not have a good case against Trump? Because (a) they keep huffing and puffing, but (b) it’s been five months since Trump left office. The contrast between claims they are about to indict against the fact that they keep delaying speaks volumes.
If they do indict later, this long delay is still enlightening. It is not that hard to type up an indictment. Once all the evidence is in at a level where they can say an indictment is likely, all that is left is typing. That should only take a few days.
What is Vance waiting for? My conclusion is that he’s got nothing. Trump’s tax returns were already in the hands of New York tax authorities for years. The courts merely allowed Vance to have his own copy – officially.
Im sure the rats were told he knows what you have been doing for many years having to deal with them
Leaks, leaks, leaks about everything Trump and all the illegal things he supposedly did. Yet, thus far EVERY leak, played up by the media and Democrats has been a huge lie. The biggest lie for the last 5 years has been that Trump has done something illegal. Lol, even the leaks the Democrats and guys like Comey have used were illegal to smear Trump, yet not a single indictment except some crazy girl named Reality Check.
Hey! Anybody have any leaks from the Maricopa Co Arizona Audit?
Dox the addresses of all the main players
Ham sandwich about to be indicted. Sun rises in the east. Usual news!