Posted on 07/06/2021 9:54:23 AM PDT by PoliticallyShort
In June, Joe Biden’s National Security Council released its National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism. The document absurdly but alarmingly claims that, out of all the fanatics who hate America and wish it harm, “the most persistent and lethal threats” are posed by domestic “racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists (principally those who promote the superiority of the white race).” Other commentators have shown that this narrative about white-supremacist “extremists” is little more than crude propaganda—an attempt to hijack our entire national security and federal law enforcement apparatus as a partisan weapon of the Democratic Party.
That is certainly a dangerous development. But I want to take a different approach and put this discussion of extremists into some historical and philosophical perspective.
In 1964, when the prolific scholar and author Harry Jaffa wrote Barry Goldwater’s acceptance speech at the Republican presidential convention, he included a now-famous line: “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice; moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Though the crowd in San Francisco’s “Cow Palace” went wild with enthusiastic approval, the sentiment was condemned by all the official organs of establishment opinion. That didn’t bother Goldwater—or Jaffa. After all, it’s the job of political philosophers (and occasionally statesmen) to challenge the complacency of established dogmas. More surprising, however, was the reaction from some professors and academically trained philosophers, who claimed that the lines misrepresented or misunderstood Aristotle’s teaching on ethics.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanmind.org ...
Extremism in defense of Liberty is no vice.
neither is racist these days- more times than not it just means you are unwilling to submit to group think on the left.
Ping!
When a mathematics, a good lawn, or a peanut butter and jelly sandwich are ‘racist’ then the term is meaningless.
Nowadays, 70% of the population could agree with you, but your opinion could still be considered “extremist”. The new definition of “extremism” apparently is just “wrong-think”.
Don’t forget black holes:
Black holes are racist? Space is the final frontier for the woke on their mission to redefine the universe
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/527453-black-holes-racist-space/
I think one member will concur.
Ha! Beat me to it! :)
Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.