Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intel to build Qualcomm chips, aims to catch foundry rivals by 2025
Reuters ^ | Today | Stephen Nellis

Posted on 07/27/2021 10:26:26 AM PDT by cba123

July 26 (Reuters) - Intel Corp (INTC.O) said on Monday its factories will start building Qualcomm Inc (QCOM.O) chips and laid out a roadmap to expand its new foundry business to catch rivals such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (2330.TW) and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (005930.KS) by 2025.

Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) will be another new customer for the foundry chip business, said Intel, which for decades held the lead in technology for manufacturing the smallest, fastest computing chips.

But Intel has lost that lead to TSMC and Samsung, whose manufacturing services have helped Intel's rivals Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD.O) and Nvidia Corp (NVDA.O) produce chips that outperform Intel's. AMD and Nvidia design chips which then are made by the rival chip manufacturers, called foundries.

Intel said on Monday it expects to regain its lead by 2025 and described five sets of chipmaking technologies it will roll out over the next four years.

(Please see full article at link)

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amd; intel; tsmc
Will these be built in America?
1 posted on 07/27/2021 10:26:26 AM PDT by cba123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cba123

https://www.reuters.com/technology/intel-build-qualcomm-chips-aims-catch-foundry-rivals-by-2025-2021-07-26/


2 posted on 07/27/2021 10:27:28 AM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Ping


3 posted on 07/27/2021 10:30:40 AM PDT by KC_Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Thank you for posting.


4 posted on 07/27/2021 10:30:47 AM PDT by KC_Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Aa an Intel shareholder of approximately a quarter century, I truly believe that the company lost its edge after Andy Grove left as chairman. It always seems like they’re chasing yesterday’s news. Okay, right now there’s a chip shortage and lack of foundry capacity... so they’re going big into the foundry business. I hope it works out for them, but their recent track record of being one or two steps behind every major trend isn’t encouraging.


5 posted on 07/27/2021 10:33:42 AM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

No problem, thank you.


6 posted on 07/27/2021 10:36:20 AM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cba123

> Will these be built in America? <

According to this article, Intel will be building these plants in Arizona.
(That’s a pleasant surprise.)

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/intel-doubles-down-on-chip-manufacturing-plans-%2420-billion-for-new-arizona-sites-2021-03


7 posted on 07/27/2021 10:37:01 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123
I hope so. Intel is struggling with their foundry. They are having trouble making 5nm and 7nm chips. They are not at the forefront of process technology.

8 posted on 07/27/2021 10:42:14 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie ("Success is 10 percent inspiration and 90 percent perspiration." — Thomas Edison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Arizona, I believe. They announced at $20B expansion of their AZ facilities earlier this year. I THINK this is going to be part of that expansion.

There’s a global appetite to move processor production away from potentially unstable parts of Asia...like China and even Taiwan.


9 posted on 07/27/2021 10:46:01 AM PDT by ScubaDiver (Reddit refugee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

And they are no longer the IP leaders, so they are taking a step down on the value chain to make parts designed by others. Kinda like going from owning a business to working for Walmart.


10 posted on 07/27/2021 10:53:47 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

Intel lost its edge after Paul Ortelini resigned.
He was almost as good as Andy who will always be missed.
Pat Gelsinger headed the 486 design team and is a good pick for CEO.

BK planted LOTS of Old Guard that need to be removed in order to make a Foundry work.
We had all the tools working and internal fighting killed the project.

TSMC still rules Foundry work so its a big leap of faith but if any company could do it, the Old Intel could make it happen.


11 posted on 07/27/2021 10:57:14 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

Well, if they spent tens of billions of dollars on developing new technology instead of buying back shares, they’re going in the right direction. IBM, apparently, isn’t even that smart.


12 posted on 07/27/2021 11:07:33 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Though this could be a very good thing, if China keeps encroaching on everyone.

That could completely reverse the last forty years of everyone bailing out of America.

Not out of the question, in my view.


13 posted on 07/27/2021 11:08:56 AM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right; cba123
Intel will be building these plants in Chandler Arizona.
14 posted on 07/27/2021 11:09:13 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cba123

> That could completely reverse the last forty years of everyone bailing out of America. <

It depends on whether of not the government will get out of the way. The EPA could find a snail darter on the site, and then shut down construction. Or some state agency could decide that the factory has too big a carbon footprint.

Nevertheless, we can always hope.


15 posted on 07/27/2021 11:15:08 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cba123

They are finally approaching the bottom. 7 Nanometers is about 35 Silicon atoms wide. Since you need a few atoms to make a transistor Moore’s law is about to end.


16 posted on 07/27/2021 11:28:38 AM PDT by Nateman (If the Left is not screaming , you are doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Didn’t we do this 6-7 years ago? And how’d that work out.


17 posted on 07/27/2021 12:10:07 PM PDT by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Intel also dropped the ball on videoconferencing. It had an excellent system but was only available for enterprise. MS cut in front w/ Lync by making it available to Office 365 users on per-license access, which meant small organizations could use it.

But then MS lost to Zoom by requiring licensing for access and limiting functionality to organization-only meetings participants. MS has greatly improved Teams, but still lags in “guest” functionality.

Competition is a healthy thing.


18 posted on 07/27/2021 2:13:21 PM PDT by nicollo (I said no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson