Note the 'value judgement' embodied here; "... the Trump administration’s approval of the project under the National Environmental Policy Act was flawed because it failed to
thoroughly analyze potential greenhouse gas pollution ..". This leaves the question of what, in the opinion of U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason, a thorough analysis would be?
My personal opinion is that Judge Gleason would probably opine that only a cancellation of the entire fossil fuel industry would reflect a sufficiently thorough analysis here.