Posted on 08/24/2021 9:18:37 PM PDT by nickcarraway
I’m not confused. Principles must be taken to their logical conclusions.
According to your arguments, I as a parent should be able to sell naked pictures of my child for any reason. If CP is illegal just cal it art or advertising or etc and I can have at it.
The child, even when grown, can just take it.
I am not confused at all.
I’m fine with naked infant pics
I think people who see it as porn are sick
Naked infant pics for recording your own kids in the tub or wandering the house etc. is not what we are talking about.
I’m fine with that too.
We are talking about selling the pics for commercial purposes.
They are beyond sick. They are seemingly irretrievably evil. So. Let’s not put out naked child pictures for them.
Agree. That undermines his case big time. I’d give him a dollar for his troubles and then send him on his way.
Sorry the album or CD were sold for the music not the naked infant boy on the front
You see what you’d like in it
That was a monumental album .....I never heard anyone say they bought it because it had a naked baby on it
Kurt Novoselic is one of the good guys, pro-Second Amendment, pretty reasonable on the issues, if not completely Conservative.
Nah. Politics aside, Foo Fighters rock.
I noticed that the Foo Fighters are now doing Bee Gees covers.
An excellent album yes.
God forbid I know anyone who would buy it for a naked baby photo.
The fact remains that pics of naked kids should not be for sale. There is evil in our midst.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.