Soros will see to it that he rules the "correct" way. Just another briefcase full of cash.
Posted on 09/20/2021 9:26:52 PM PDT by bitt
Will they listen to over 60 million voices from the grave?
Uh; or from garbage pits?
Yeah, we’ll see how those Heritage Foundation picks are.
Barnett will vote pro infanticide.
She will do so to stand with “women”.
Roe is just plain bad “law” and clearly unconstitutional.
Regardless how the Hign Court rules, I hope these Red States continue to pass inventive anti-abortion laws that scare away liberals from moving into their states.
Well, they’re 60,000,000+ dead babies late with this, but better late than never.
Soros will see to it that he rules the "correct" way. Just another briefcase full of cash.
Well, we know the intimidating and threatening reminders will go out to Kavanaugh and Roberts.
December….what a Christmas gift this could be. I’m not getting my hopes up. I’m sure Roberts will deem it a tax.
patriot torch wrote:
“My body my choice is the response to the murder of tens of millions of babies.
But when it comes to the jab, you have no choice. To refuse the jab is bio terrorism.”
And when choice is brought up in the context of the shots, liberals will just say that pregnancy isn’t transmissible, but the virus is.
I recall New York state a few years ago, changed its law to allow abortion in anticipation that R v W would soon be overturned. Sure, there are some states that won't allow abortion, but a cheap, short plane ride somewhere will get the job done.
If overturned, it just negates federal law, but state law is valid. However, that does place abortion law in a more local venue and conservatives can support state legislative candidates that will overturn state laws. It will hold politicians accountable and, at the moment, politicians can hide behind the Supreme Court, so it is an improvement. But overturning R v W is not a magical solution to abortion.
So Be It!
No nationally legalized pre-born child sacrifice. EVER.
God’s blood red line for all nations is legalizing child sacrifice. Consequence is invasion and conquest. On His timeline because He always gives an opportunity to overturn.
However, it must be reiterated for those nations (few) that still outlaw the abomination that when it is legalized the sentence will be fulfilled. In 2 Kings 24, “And the LORD would not forgive.” (the nation)
A reprieve is possible with overturning. King Manasseh repented and destroyed the altars. His grandson, Josiah, lead the nation in a great revival. Manasseh was forgiven.
Reminds me. The repentant prayer of King Manasseh is amongst the 14 books of the Apocrypha. (LOL re-reading and noticed my reverting to amongst...)
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Prayer%20of%20Manasseh&version=CEB
True. So we see what is set before us.
“(LOL re-reading and noticed my reverting to amongst...)”
That classicist prose is why I advocate reading the King James version; it’s beautiful text, ENRICHING to the literary power of the reader. I’m not a “KJV Only” guy; especially now, with many versions readily available, I tend to read multiple versions when seeking to get a full sense of a passage. The NET, with its COPIOUS notes, is a favorite.
But, for style, grace, beauty, and overall prosaic quality — the King James is my first recommendation. Still, not that volume only, but documents and letters from the period of the American Revolution, as well as many grand classics: Dickens, Defoe, Stevenson, the Bronte sisters, Melville (yes, Moby Dick), Tolkien — the unrivaled power of his soaring ascents to grand and poetic elegy of fallen heroes, and songs of men and elves from ancient days — moves the very soul, Twain’s 19th Century colloquial, and on, and on through the great halls of literature where authors of stature bent their skill to the pen in a collective tour de force of English at the zenith of its strength.
So, “amongst”; yea, verily; along with other hallmarks of a better, vanished style that tend more to season my writing than my speaking. A “Keeper of the Flame” ye be; a steward of better language from better times.
This didn’t tell what Fitch’s argument is.
Seems it must be a decent one for SCOTUS to accept it though.
Chipping away at it is better than no progress at all.
They never actually took an election case on appeal did they?
Bingo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.