Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

Incorrect. She used a common libel defense saying she’s allowed to make charges in a lawsuit that are then resolved in court, and also to speak about those charges. And no reasonable person would take the charges as true until the resolution of the case.

Of course, no court would hear the suit because our courts are corrupt.


51 posted on 09/22/2021 6:02:16 AM PDT by servantoftheservant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: servantoftheservant

No ..what she said is that no reasonable person would take what she said as fact..and that is exactly what so many here did..even to the point of one poster claiming i was jealous of her because i didnt believe her and said her lawsuit would go nowhere.


54 posted on 09/22/2021 6:14:41 AM PDT by RummyChick (Bagram was the most logical exit point. Stand up and justify your decision (hat tip Larrytown))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson