Posted on 10/02/2021 9:09:06 AM PDT by EBH
Seriously, if this isn't being "proposed" then why do they need the money to study it?
Do they really think the public is stupid? 6 months from now we'll see this new tax and the lie will fall apart.
They are engaged in the first steps of enacting just such a tAsk
Does anyone remember, post 9/11, that the Dept of Homeland Security was just supposed to be a clearinghouse to make sure different agencies were not running concurrent investigations on the same people, to establish de-conflict on protocols and develop partnerships for agencies to work together? Where representatives from the various agencies would get together and compare notes?
I remember that.
Now they have armed agents all over the place trying to figure out if they’re Customs, DEA, FBI, Marshals, etc etc. etc.
It’s not a tax, it’s not on everybody, and it’s voluntary...
Until it’s not, comrade.
And why would you want a mileage tax Representative Donkey?
So the Republicans, who often live in the outer suburbs, pay more tax than the Democrats, who generally live closer to town.
Yeah, just like the darned shots.
They are going to have to do something about electric cars, which don’t pay the tax applied to gasoline. A mileage tax might make sense for them. I like the idea of paying taxes for roads based on how much you use them. Trucks pay a fortune - and they should.
For electric cars. They pay no “gas” tax.
When/if we go to electric vehicles, they’ll need to make up for gas taxes. States will want to do it too.
Gonna suck for us rural people. It’s 50 miles round trip to a town for us.
Much easier to ask, “What kind of disaster is NOT in the infrastructure bill or any other bill for that matter?”
This mess is a shop of horrors and it is BIG, not little.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The administration has not proposed that tax. A provision in Biden’s $1 trillion infrastructure bill before Congress would establish a national study to assess how such a tax could be implemented. It would not actually enact that tax, nor it does not outline a rate of 8 cents per mile.
Can I ask a stupid question? Why in the sam hill would anyone want to merely study how to assess a type of tax, unless they had already conceived of the idea of implementing such a tax?
And does anyone seriously believe, that such a study of the tax, once completed, would conclude that we should NOT actually implement the tax???
This is sophistry to say they are merely studying this type of tax.
“You have to read the bill to find out what’s in it” - all 10,000 plus pages.
> AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. <
If the AP says that it’s false then it’s probably true.
Some have said a mileage tax would replace the current gas taxes.
More likely, we will end up with both a mileage tax and a gas tax.
Perhaps electric cars should pay a mileage tax, since they pay no gas taxes.
But as electric car use increases in the years ahead, a mileage tax would be used so that electric car owners are paying taxes to pay for roads.
Maybe off topic, but in some places, gas tax revenue has been diverted to other uses. There really needs to be some structure in place, to ensure that specific taxes paid for specific purposes go only to those purposes.
8.1 cents per mile! Given the current Pennsylvania gasoline tax of 58.7 cents per gallon this proposal assumes the average auto only gets 58.7 / 8.1 = 7.2 mpg. I have not gotten that kind of gas guzzling mileage since I owned a 454 big block and had a lead foot.
Put another way, with the current middle of the road CAFE standard of about 30 mpg the 8.1 cents per mile tax amounts to something like $2.00 per gallon!
It doesn’t take anything but math to figure out these maggots are thieves and stupid.
https://taxfoundation.org/pennsylvania-considers-equivalent-2-per-gallon-gas-tax/
“Seriously, if this isn’t being “proposed” then why do they need the money to study it?”
The dems are insisting we move off gasoline/diesel fueled vehicles. Therefore they will have to implement an alternative to gasoline taxes.
They need a study to figure out how to implement a mileage tax.
To get more taxpayer $ the speed from “study” to “implement” is nanoseconds.
And since this administration know NO ONE will push back on any dictate, this will happen.
This isn’t about collecting revenue, it is about control. Taxing people per mile would require installing a massive infrastructure to track vehicles and sensors in the cars. There is no way that this predatory government will trust Americans to voluntarily report their odometer mileage every so often.
There are much more efficient ways of raising revenue than this approach.
…and the Gasoline Tax will NEVER be repealed, in fact, that, too, will skyrocket because of “climate change..” Summary: The Demoncrat Party wants ALL of the money.
cause the gas tax isn’t a mileage tax...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.