Facebook does not have the ‘right’ to cut you off when it’s claiming to just be a platform and not a publisher. Its section 230 protections need to evaporate. Fakebook wants its cake and to eat it too. JMHO.
Of course not. That’s the thing Stossel doesn’t seem to realize; Section 230 protections mean you MUST accept most forms of speech.
“Facebook does not have the ‘right’ to cut you off when it’s claiming to just be a platform and not a publisher.”
Agree, FAR TOO MANY pointy-nosed libertarian types, like Rand Paul, are PERFECTLY FINE with Facebook and other monopolies doing the dirty work of government censorship. They’d probably support AT&T cutting off Reagan’s phone service back then, since AT&T is a ‘private company’.