Posted on 10/14/2021 1:39:01 PM PDT by DallasBiff
A key Food and Drug Administration advisory committee unanimously recommended Thursday giving booster shots of Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine to people age 65 and older and other vulnerable Americans, a crucial step before the U.S. can start administering third shots to some of the more than 69 million people who originally received that vaccine.
The nonbinding decision by the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee would bring guidelines for Moderna in line with third shots of Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine. Those shots were authorized less than a month ago to a wide array of Americans, including the elderly, adults with underlying medical conditions and t
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
did they admit there are dangers?
did they admit how much they were paid by the company?
did they admit to how much kickbacks they get, and in
how many ways?
did they admit that THEY and their families are EXEMPT?
and given HCQ?
Hitler killed off the less-than-perfect too.
Starting as a Pure Blood, can someone start with a J&J, followed by a shot of Pfizer, or should they get a Moderna first, then the Pfizer eliminating the J&J altogether?
You caught that, right? This is an informal sample of opinions--possibly restricted to Democrats--that has no scientific, medical, or legal significance.
Nothing says trust us better than a vaccine they admit didn’t work and protects no one. Then the chutzpah to bring up that the first 2 shots were garbage so here let’s get a third of the same thing and see how it goes. Used car sales could take pointers from these losers.
I’m not knocking it, once people have taken two shots and survived, sure, get the booster too.
But you have to admit, you get more guarantees with an extended auto warranty, which is what these shots remind me of.
They may not be “at-risk” now, but they will be soon!
why woudl they recommend ‘at risk’ get it if everyone else that got the shots don’t need it supposedly because they have enough protection against the covids? Does the original vaccine jab discriminate against at riskers by not being as potent as it is for non at riskers?
Are they saying that “Everyone will be protected with just the two original shots of moderna- except at riskers who lose protection”?
First it was one shot- then ‘oh nope- gonna need 2’, now it’s ‘gonna need 3 if you’re at risk’- The curve will be flattened in 15 days- then ‘nope, gonna take longer’, Masks are required ‘because they are so effective at stopping covid’, then ‘oops- gonna need two masks’ Not to mention, some cause clots, some myocarditis (sp?)- some have apparently died from the vaccines, some apparently injured for life- Children don’t need the vaccines, they are nearly 100% immune to serious side effects, now ‘nope- all kids must be vaccinated, wear masks at all times, and stay 15 feet away from everyone-
Hard to keep track -
-
In case the first two didn’t kill them. 😐
Sunday Booster , Monday Booster , Tuesday Booster , Wednesday 2 Boosters ,Thursday Booster , Friday Booster , Saturday 3 Boosters
yup its totally illogical
We demand you get vaxxed
with the same vax we got vaxxed with
that doesnt protect any of us
from the thing we took the same vax for
or from any of you that remain unvaxxed
(that tells you the vax is worthless)
but
Translation, let’s get rid of the most vulnerable first
The data points to the biggest risk being the Jim Jones Jab itself.
He liked dogs...
"Booster, booster, booster!"
My 75 year old landlord thinks that there should be separate stores for the unvaxxed. I asked if they should also sport a yellow star of David? He wouldn’t answer. He is also raring to get his ‘gene therapy’ booster shot. If he were able to get a triple, he’d be even happier, I’m sure.
The “old geeser” will be room temperature within 6 months to 3 years from the killer jabs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
