Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republican Wildcat

Mark Richards did a spectacular job. His job was to defend Kyle, and during the trial I was frustrated by what I thought was passiveness. But the jury brought back the best verdict, even with difficult circumstances.

Richards might be a bit of a liberal, but, gosh, I’d want him defending me.


2 posted on 11/24/2021 5:38:27 AM PST by Fido969 (45 is Superman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fido969

i thought Richards was so-so...the other attorney was very very good....Richards closing argument was terrible...he jumped all over...kept mixing up names...at times he was almost incoherent...good thing this was such a clear case of self defense.


7 posted on 11/24/2021 5:44:42 AM PST by basalt (exas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Fido969
I learned a long time ago never to take a lawyer's court manners and decisions at face value. And in this particular case, I think one group of people who come out looking like they're just one step above the mainstream media in terms of lost credibility is the endless group of "armchair lawyers" posting during the course of the trial and claiming that Rittenhouse's legal team was incompetent.

The lawyers in the courtroom have the advantage of knowing who is on the jury, and how they respond to different things during the course of the trial. They also tend to know the judge a hell of a lot better than some dope weighing in on his web camera a thousand miles away.

19 posted on 11/24/2021 5:58:34 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest, ‘til a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Fido969
The lawyers on Andrew Branca's site were less kind about Richards. According to them, he missed several opportunities to slow down the aggressive tactics of ADA Binger, and made what could have been a disasterous motion to have the judge dismiss without prejudice. If the State would have accepted this, the case would have been retried. By the way, this motion was made during deliberations!

Richards benefited from an absolute, rock solid case on the facts and evidence, yet it still took three and a half days of deliberations to get there. It's sort of like winning a game in overtime when you started out with a 20 point lead.

Of course, Rittenhouse was certainly poorly served by his previous lawyers and that's another thing that makes Richards look better.

48 posted on 11/24/2021 7:52:31 AM PST by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson