[Guenevere]

Bttt

[Babba Gi]

“Dark Lord of Disease” Move over JK Rowling.

[Enlightened1]

All 3 of them know it’s not legal and/or within the Constitution.

This is why they did not bother to address that aspect of it.

[caww]

With communications what they are today it’s difficult for the incompetent to keep their masks on.....camera’s everywhere with citizens and otherwise. Lots of young people can’t wait for an opportunity to ‘show and tell’ for their moment of fame.

Add to this the degree of interest where once was almost nothing has escalated.

[MtnClimber]

[Adder]

everything our Founding Fathers fought and died for is likely to be lost, because there will no longer be any defining rules.

We are pretty much there now. This would be an awfully big nail in the coffin...

[marktwain]

The three Progressive judges, Sotomeyer, Kagan, and Breyer, are only following the Progressive philosophy regarding the Constitution. It is (there is no question, this is repeatedly stated in the founding documents of Progressivism):

1. The Constitution is old and was relevant for its time. It is no longer relevant.

2. Wise elites must find ways to "work around" the Constitution to obtain the results they desire.

3. Wise elites must shape the public perception in order to get what they desire.

4. Any methods, including lying to the public is acceptable to get the results desired.

5. In order to be a member of the wise elites, one has to be a Progressive.

6. As the Progressives only want to do good, and they must have power to do good, therefore any method to hold onto power is acceptable, so they can do good.

[Zathras]

In all my years, I’ve never seen members of the Supreme Court spout propaganda.
I may disagree with their rulings but this is really scary.

[Sirius Lee]

Affirmative action: Ensuring paychecks for inferior talent and performance for decades.

[Phinneous]

Wise Latina woman? More like Latinx estupidx.

[eeriegeno]

“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States; and that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

Where in there does it say anything about repeating CNN talking points? Or other personal views?

Recuse from this case or step down......

[anton]

Ethics complaint needed. that or impeachment.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

LOL, like this is new. Started with the Marshall court and peaked in 1973. This isn’t new it is Standard Operating Proceedure. As if Ginsberg every worried about the letter of the law or restrictions spelled out in the Constution. Leftist judges rule by seat of the pants fiat. They just make it up as they go, as long as it aligns with their political philosophy.

“Laws. We don’t need no Laws. We don’t got to show you no steenkin’ Laws!”