Jennifer Griffin and Psaki agree.
“Those are Soviet-era biolabs that the U.S. has been engaged [with] since 2005...”
If they started working with Ukraine in the past year or two, then MAYBE I’d believe the propaganda from the US Government/Soros/Meda, but it has been 17 YEARS - why are we still there messing around in those labs, particularly after we’ve learned what Fauchi was doing in Wuhan?
Griffin is a Woke Leftist, Carlson has gone off the deep end. Ignore both. Make your own decisions from those that you trust.
Griffin is the Official Spokesperson for the Military-Industrial Complex. Eisenhower would have seen her as a traitor. And so do I.
I’m siding with Tucker on this.
“Soviet era”? How long does it take to just destroy the place and build something worthwhile? Sounds more like a huge waste of America’s money.
Jennifer Griffin’s husband is a “reporter” for NPR and she’s also an anti-Trumper. All she did is read a “fact sheet” put out by the Pentagram.
Oh totally believable! The US has been working since 2005 to clean up these old SOVIET facilities.
The Russians are not the good guys, but the USA is certainly one of the bad guys. Fact!
Turned the bio labs into baby milk and aspirin factories, I’m sure.
Waitammit.
“ But what Russia does is they take that information, distort it, turn it around and turn it into disinformation.”
I’ve lost track of who/what is being discussed. Isn’t this precisely what the Democrats did on the PeePaperDossier? And, the WuhanFlu? And the Afganistan abandonement? Etc.
As to the centers, you entered in 2005 and material is still there? I call BS. That is 7 years to destroy something. Look what y’all have done to the US economy since BeijingBiden was installed.
The same with the Wuhan laboratory. There were public documents which showed our involvement.
It was that no one was paying attention, in large part, because the dominant media was not interested.
Why would Jennifer Griffin be any more credible than Tucker Carlson on this?
It may very well be that Carlson is wrong but I strongly doubt he’s intentionally spreading disinformation. Griffin, I’m not so sure.
Hmmmm. Perhaps Tucker’s problem is the admins “We have NO such work taking place in labs that we are a part of...” then they(vickie neuland) contradict themselves with “We have been working with the Ukranians on ways to stop bio attacks using lab facilities....” And Jenny knew from her sources but didn’t call out the mis/dis/mal-information? Are we getting ‘cronkited’ by someone?
She didn’t contradict a damn thing. She just read the Pentagon’s propaganda. There was no reporting at all.
And Tucker had read the same sheet and dissected it. Just because something isn’t meant as a weapon, doesn’t mean it can’t be used as such. And if so, then why would we be funding that?
Agree or disagree, he asked a legit question. Griffin gave the impression of throwing a tantrum.
As well she should if you have any understanding of Russia, history, security matters, and reality you would know that Tucker has on guests who are the worst tools of the left and of Russia.
Like the former colonel who has been appearing on Russian state television for years criticizing the United States and supporting Russia’s aggressiveness.
I suspect that I am not the only one who is seeing that Hannity has become a war-mongering neo-con.
Hannity brings on guests who will say stuff that aligns with his views of getting tough against Russia.
She should debate Tucker Carlson. Would be fun to watch.
Kerfuffle over not much. Point to the nation that is the biggest genetic bio-weapons researcher in the world - hint, not Ukraine, not Russia, not USA. Hummm, wonder who that could be?
Neocons need a new war after botching the last one.