Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt

Yup. And its fair and equal treatment.

And there will be plenty of non-combat places to put them as well, there are multiple people behind each infantryman supporting logistics and support. They can do needed logistics in an office or warehouse, they don’t have to go to combat. In fact they should not be put into squads because they reduce squad mission capability and morale. But they can be useful in support roles and not reduce fighting ability.


6 posted on 03/14/2022 7:31:56 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man

Muhammed Ali wouldn’t play that game.


7 posted on 03/14/2022 7:33:42 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

“And there will be plenty of non-combat places to put them as well,”

That is not legal under US law. They will be infantry, and everything surrounding that.


10 posted on 03/14/2022 7:40:46 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

If women are going to demand half the programming jobs, half the engineering jobs. half the CEO jobs, then they should be half of those on the front lines. You can’t demand half of the prestige jobs.

They should be half the fatalities as well. If they are running below expectations on fatalities, then the proportion in the front needs to be adjusted so the fatalities are equalized.


18 posted on 03/14/2022 8:00:17 PM PDT by alternatives? (The only reason to have an army is to defend your borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson