Posted on 03/21/2022 11:48:39 AM PDT by DeweyCA
CRT is a sure guarantee that the law school’s standards existeth not.
For students of marginal ability, it’s an ideal place.
For students interested in real law, avoid at all costs.
And, of course, avoid grads of that place. In practice, and in politics. (Unless, one is interested in corrupt, venal, self-centered, illogical, and probably unlawful “law”.
Hopefully, we’ll have an approved disposal method for these types of lawyers.
Don’t fret this nonsense. I’ve been a lawyer for a long time. Nothing about CRT is going to infect the profession. Remember, for every side pushing an issue touching on CRT, there is the other side. Hell, I bet only 10% of law students ever takes a course with CRT front and center.
Why must it end in violince. You have to ask?
Hemp rope is all natural and environmentally friendly.
Ask the Asians that are trying to get into said law schools if they are being discriminated against!!
Uh ohhhh.
Lawyers are a dime a dozen. We should pass an amendment that forbids them from running for political office.
It has my vote.
But:
<>At Boston College Law School this semester, a constitutional law professor asked students: “Who does not think we should scrap the constitution?” According to a student in the class, not a single person raised their hand.<>
As I see it, law students are so much as taught the law isn't the law.
Equal Justice Before Law
Ask the Asians that are trying to get into said law schools if they are being discriminated against!!
Uh ohhhh.
This becomes CRT when the classes are identified, as racist activists have insisted in the United States, with race, specifically black and white. That is not necessarily the case in Critical Legal Theory, whose Marxian roots are in economic classes rather than racial, but any class signifier will suffice. One popular example is the class of non-smokers and the class of smokers: legislation here has resulted in a formerly oppressive class, the smokers (recall being trapped in an office full of them), having their privileges revoked by the non-smokers and relegated to practicing their class signifier first in the hallways and later out in the rain. What resulted from that legislative overturn is not equity at all. Where the class signifier is sex, the formerly oppressive Male class has had that privilege overturned in law by a newly oppressive Female class - again, equity is not the result, nor was it intended to be.
What results is not in any normal interpretation justice, it is an artificial order posed on a potentially restive society to keep it in line with the programs and intentions of the authoritarian class which exists quite outside of the strictures of the theory that gives it that control.
Bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.