Translation: Facebook, you’re not doing enough to drive people into climate change propaganda. Bad facebook. Not woke enough.
“Meanwhile, John’s account began by liking the page of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the United Nations scientific body.”
Because the UN isn’t political but Dr. Malone is.
Translation - Actual facts sunk into their feed…
So Facebook manipulation is the reason I think the IPCC is full of shit? Nope. I thought that long before Facebook came around and nothing in the actual data has made me think otherwise. If you actually practice science you don’t worry about so-called deniers; you worry about how you can back your conclusions or change them from the data available.
The press keeps using the world “disinformaiton”.
I do not think that word means what they think it means.
Actually, given the past few years, I do not think that they think at all.
Translation: INFORMATION is preventing the public from believing (like cultists) in the bogus BS of the IPCC.
No one denies there is a climate. No one denies that climate changes. More and more people deny the IPCC and UN are "here to help." Why? Their message remains the same. Send money, send more money, send lots more money.
“designed to reduce misinformation”.
Sounds more like telling us that only their opinion is right.
The pearl clutching continues.
Or does does it drive climate bots to skepicism?
The more eyes looking at sham constructs like the IPCC the more skepticism grows. It’s instructive how it seems critical that we all accept their ridiculous lies.
How likely is it that warming, cooling, flooding, drought, storms and lack of storms are all caused by the same invisible force?
The IPCC is not a “scientific body.” The I stands for intergovernmental, meaning politicians and bureaucrats. The report they feed to the media, a “Summary for Policymakers,” is composed and approved by politicians. There are research reports which purportedly support the summary but there is little resemblance once the pols get through gutting the research.
Reporters never read the actual research because 1) they are lazy and 2) they don’t know enough to understand what they would be reading. Instead they simply regurgitate public relations releases from green advocacy groups.
May be it’s just the tin foil hat conspiracy theorist side of me, but I suspect that most of Face Books logarithms are designed to display adds that may be of interest to the user.