Skip to comments.
How deadly is Putin's nuclear 'Satan 2' missile?
Live Science ^
| 4/22/22
| Ben Turner
Posted on 04/24/2022 10:17:56 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: Roman_War_Criminal
It’s not a “controversial new intercontinental ballistic missile” ?
2
posted on
04/24/2022 10:22:46 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: Roman_War_Criminal
3
posted on
04/24/2022 10:23:34 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
((The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.))
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Still fighting the last “war”. Next one will be way different. That is what we need to watch for.
4
posted on
04/24/2022 10:26:46 AM PDT
by
rellic
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Given their “performance” in Ukraine, It's like a monkey with a grenade.
To: Steely Tom
It is likely redundant.
Maybe some of the old missiles need replacement due to deterioration, so thats one reason for this thing. But otherwise an ICBM is an ICBM. If they work at all, they work well enough for MAD.
6
posted on
04/24/2022 10:29:51 AM PDT
by
buwaya
(Strategic imperatives )
To: Roman_War_Criminal
How deadly is Putin's nuclear 'Satan 2' missile? F around and find out
7
posted on
04/24/2022 10:33:35 AM PDT
by
atc23
(The Matriarchal Society we embrace has led to masks and mandates and the cult of "safety")
To: buwaya
If they work at all, they work well enough for MAD....but even MAD is no guarantee that Murphy's Law won't intervene, via the unintentional or unauthorized use of one or more nuclear weapons...
;>)
8
posted on
04/24/2022 10:37:57 AM PDT
by
Who is John Galt?
("...mit Pulver und Blei, Die Gedanken sind frei!")
To: Roman_War_Criminal
It’s not even close to being in production
What a bunch of sissies.
The Russians have MIRVs. How 1960’s of them.
To: Roman_War_Criminal; Chode; SkyDancer; Salamander; carriage_hill; Lockbox; MtnClimber; ...
Just released picture:
10
posted on
04/24/2022 10:39:00 AM PDT
by
mabarker1
((Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of parCongress !)
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Until they can neutralize our sub launched ICBM’s, upgraded land based missiles serve no real advantage to the nuclear war principle of mutually assured destruction, changing only a lessened response time.
11
posted on
04/24/2022 10:44:58 AM PDT
by
Rowdyone
(Vigilence)
To: buwaya
“an ICBM is an ICBM.”
Not if one carries multiple warheads each capable of mNeuvering independently!
To: Steely Tom
From what I understand the new missile is still liquid fueled, so it would take about an hour to fuel up prior to launch from silos deep inside Russia. Meaning it’s definitely a first strike weapon, but one that would give us plenty of advanced warning.
To: BenLurkin
14
posted on
04/24/2022 10:52:44 AM PDT
by
libh8er
To: Roman_War_Criminal
To: TexasGator
Multiple warheads are same old same old.
Maneuvering independly only matters if there is a sufficient ABM system to be effective in a major nuclear exchange. There isn’t.
16
posted on
04/24/2022 10:54:29 AM PDT
by
buwaya
(Strategic imperatives )
To: Roman_War_Criminal
I would imagine that it's deadlier than the 'Satan 1' missile but not quite as deadly as the 'Satan 3' missile.
(Just my guess...)
17
posted on
04/24/2022 10:54:36 AM PDT
by
Captain Walker
("If you think tough men are dangerous, wait until you see what weak men are capable of."- J Peterson)
THIS is where they spend their limited money. And they get it RIGHT. They don't waste rubles on 1000 dollar optics on their guns or the latest APCs or wi-fi hotspots for their troops or schools for ingrate subhuman muslims.
They spend it on the DESTRUCTION of the Untied States. And to all of you flag waving "Willpuddabootinyerassitstheuhmurricanway" fatass old farts joking about their truck convoys and boats sinking would be real surprised if they ever escalate, and play for keeps.
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Probably just as deadly as our “Peace Keeper” or “Minuteman” ICBMs only with a very scary name.
19
posted on
04/24/2022 10:56:07 AM PDT
by
Delta 21
(It started as a virus, and mutated into an IQ test.)
To: atc23
“ F around and find out ”
Finding out goes both ways. Their finding out will be a lot less pleasant.
20
posted on
04/24/2022 10:58:11 AM PDT
by
libh8er
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson