Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: enumerated

I think “predator” is the word that is most appropriate.

And likely ALL other people are a means to an end, not just the guard, who was probably convinced that he loved her.


16 posted on 05/07/2022 1:52:51 PM PDT by susannah59 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: susannah59

Right, “predator” is a lot more appropriate.

But really, there’s nothing wrong with being a predator in the food chain, as all humans naturally are.

I think these journalists should go back to calling murderers murderers, and stop trying to be creative. “Murder” is the unjustified killing by humans of other humans.

That pretty much says it all, and distinguishes the act from innocent animals, innocent hunters, or innocent victims defending themselves.

If the particular murderer killed a lot of people - or was especially brutal, crazy, or sociopathic, we have adjectives for that: “mass”, “serial”, “brutal”, “psycho”, “sociopathic”, etc..

I don’t like “butcher” either - because that’s an innocent and necessary profession.

Calling murders “shootings” or “deaths” or “abortions” is problematic too, because it infers passivity - like they just happened and no one is responsible for committing them.


18 posted on 05/07/2022 2:28:20 PM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson