Dunno. How much have they got? All of it, boy.
Posted on 05/08/2022 8:23:53 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
As it looks increasingly likely that Elon Musk is serious about buying Twitter and taking it private, reporters have been scrambling to figure out precisely what the richest man in the world plans to do with the company once the deal closes. That’s expected to take another six months before all of the wrangling is complete. In usual Musk fashion, Elon isn’t making it easy to figure out because he has yet to release any sort of official agenda, instead just tweeting out various ideas and proposals. But the New York Times got hold of a “pitch deck” that Musk recently delivered to potential investors and more details emerged than had previously been made public. Two of his central plans stand out in particular. For one thing, he plans to go through and fire a lot of people. For another, he believes that he can massively increase the number of premium users who will pay a monthly fee to use the service. (Daily Mail)
Elon Musk is planning to fire 1,000 staffers at Twitter as soon as his purchase of the social media platform is complete. It’s believed he will fire many of the firm’s woke staff following the transfer of ownership which will take around six months, after which Musk is likely to wield the ax.
But then within the next three years, Musk anticipates making thousands of new hires, swelling the ranks to around 11,000 employees, up from 7,500 currently.
Much of the new talent is likely to be in the field of engineering.
Notice the use of the phrase “fire many of the firm’s woke staff…” Nobody’s really even trying to disguise what’s going on at this point. The people who have been in charge of censoring conservatives will be getting their walking papers, along with the entire board of directors. That won’t happen overnight, but it’s clearly on Musk’s list of higher priorities.
Musk is also considering shutting down the company’s entire headquarters in San Francisco to reduce expenses, converting the facility into a homeless shelter if he can work that out with the state and municipal governments. The vast majority of Twitter employees may wind up working remotely on a permanent basis.
Those are all cost-cutting measures, but Musk will still need to drive more revenue to reach his stated goals. In addition to advertising revenue and a new, mystery product that he only calls “X” for now, Musk also claims he will massively expand the service’s base of paid subscribers. For a small fee, you can already sign up for their premium “blue” level, but Musk is claiming that the number of paid subscribers will rise to 69 million in a few years.
Is that a realistic goal? I’ve yet to see Twitter release an official number of subscribers, but initial reactions from analysts in the tech sector suggest that the company had a “lukewarm” reception from users. Twitter currently claims to have just short of 400 million users who log on at least once per month. So Musk would need to convince more than one-fifth of that audience to start paying a monthly fee for a service that has traditionally been available for free.
Perhaps a lot of people will do it just to get a blue checkmark. (Presumably, once your payment clears you have been confirmed as a “real person.”) But aside from an edit or “undo” feature, you don’t get a lot more beyond that. I might consider signing up just as a nod to the lack of censorship and I already have a blue check, but I get the feeling I’m probably in the minority here.
Elon Musk has repeatedly said that he doesn’t care about Twitter’s profit or loss status “at all.” But he’s also a businessman. He can’t keep continually running it in the red and bleeding money, right? Yet he’s been amazingly successful in his other ventures, so we should probably give him the benefit of the doubt and wait to see what he does with it.
I pay much more per month in appreciation of the privilege of FR. If I cared at all about Twitter, 3 bucks wouldn’t seem like much.
CNN+.
I think they will.
“Will people really pay $3 per month for Twitter?”
He is not talking about charging everyone. As I understand the fee would apply to business and government users. So yes, I suspect lots of business users would pay the $3.
How much will the 17 IC entities pay?
Dunno. How much have they got? All of it, boy.
I’ll never join Twitter, no matter who owns it.
Ditto.
Cheap, vile, world loathing leftists won’t pay without bitchin’ and moanin’. It would be worth it just to hear them squeal.
Not me.
I proudly have a Twitter account.
It is my 2nd tab after FR and then I have the Salem sites (Twitchy, RedState, etc.)
You get news in real time.
Twitter is the greatest communication tool since the printing press itself.
Me either. Shit, I wasn’t on it when it was free!
Charging individual users will be the death of twitter
I won’t but I’m not stupid.
Just like my late Dad told the local news paper publisher, “I wouldn’t buy it if it was free.”
ditto for farcebook etc.
ABSOLUTELY!
No.
I wouldn’t use Twitter if they paid me three dollars a month.
still be free, it’s for twitter +
Troubled Twitter, Netflix, Disney, CNN+, and a few others — maybe the pendulum of wokeness is slowly starting to move in the opposite direction.
“Twitter is the greatest (soon to be/have Free Speech!!!) communication tool since the printing press itself.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.