Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary-Lawyer Sussman Acquitted Of Lying To FBI In 'Russia Hoax' Farce
Twitter - Zero Hedge ^ | May 31st, 2022 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 05/31/2022 9:22:31 AM PDT by shadowlands1960

Michael Sussmann, a lawyer representing Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign, has been found not guilty of a single count of lying to the FBI when he said he was not working on behalf of any client when he alleged a covert communications channel between the Trump Organization and Russia's Alfa Bank.

Sussmann was charged under 18 U.S.C. 1001 with lying to the FBI during a meeting with then-FBI general counsel James Baker when he came forward with what he claimed was evidence of possible covert communications between the Trump organization and Alfa, a Russian bank. Sussmann allegedly concealed that he was representing the Clinton campaign, which he billed for his efforts.

The verdict comes after a two week trial led to more than a day of deliberations... by this jury:

(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1trusttheplan; 2; biden; braking; clintoncrimefamily; corrupticrats; demagogicparty; didyousearch; fakenews; hitlery; jamesbaker; jurynullification; kangaroocourt; michaelsussmann; obamajudge; q; qwrongagain; rachelmaddow; russia; russiahoax; sussmanntrial; swampjesters; swampjustice; thefixisin; trump; twitter; tyranny; whytheywanttheguns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: shadowlands1960

Sussman is a little fish comparatively.

While I’m not happy about this, I do wonder if Durham
continues his march to the Queen of this operation.

THEN he seeks a change of venue.

A decent judge reviewing this case, will see the need for
that change of venue.

Sussman was free the moment the trial was situated
in W., D.C.


21 posted on 05/31/2022 9:34:30 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

What an F’ing joke our “justice” system is.

Every man and women for themselves. I’ve been practicing “getting mine and my families” for a while now. Screw our so called justice system. And yea, my attitude is contributing to the downfall. Don’t care anymore. I’m not gonna be the schmuck following the rules while everyone else games the system and gets ahead.


22 posted on 05/31/2022 9:35:49 AM PDT by hillarys cankles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

There was zero chance a DC jury would vote 12-0 to convict a high level rat.


23 posted on 05/31/2022 9:35:54 AM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Never happen. Never....


24 posted on 05/31/2022 9:36:29 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

This now gives Garland cover to shut down the entire investigation.


25 posted on 05/31/2022 9:37:49 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I’m not a big fan of the ‘lie to the FBI, go to jail law.’... I’m actually more a fan of the ‘get rid of the FBI completely’ law. That being said, this was never going to happen in DC. Jury nullification is widely accepted as a legitimate political tactic in the black community.


26 posted on 05/31/2022 9:38:06 AM PDT by shadowlands1960 ("...some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again... " CSL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

The right needs to start jury nullification regardless as to what the evidence shows. Anytime you are on the jury, make your decision based on politics rather than the law.


27 posted on 05/31/2022 9:38:10 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Yes, Hillary’s credibility and career are in the toilet. Some good did come out in the trial.


28 posted on 05/31/2022 9:39:15 AM PDT by Huskrrrr (Alinsky, you magnificent Bastard, I read your book!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

Disgusting, proof that there is no justice in our banana republic. The Judge is an Obama judge, whose daughter is acquainted with Sussman’s daughter. The judge allowed several pro Hillary donors to be on the jury. This case was the equivalent of shoveling shit against the tide. The MSM will have a field day portraying Sussman and Hillary as martyrs.


29 posted on 05/31/2022 9:41:35 AM PDT by kenmcg (tHE WHOLE )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

So what, it apparently wasn’t against the law, the Durham investigation is over, this was the first and supposedly the easiest case to prove, anything that comes next will be dismissed as a right wing conspiracy


30 posted on 05/31/2022 9:41:59 AM PDT by srmanuel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hillarys cankles
This is how empires collapse. When individuals no longer believe themselves to be citizens of that empire.

We joke that Biden is just a Resident of the White House.

However, his and Obama's policies have so undermined the nature of the American Empire, that we are now mere residents of the US.

In what way are our values represented by our current laws and the current crop of "representatives"?

The "patriotic" thing is to pretend that somehow with enough effort we will once again be a Constitutional Republic, but it is just as true that with enough effort we will put a colony on Pluto.

31 posted on 05/31/2022 9:42:02 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (This is not a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

The verdict is not a surprise given the DC jurisdiction and its jury pool, but that’s not the big story. This “losing” case has destroyed the attorney-client privilege that the big fish were counting on to defend themselves. That strategic victory outweighs any conviction of Sussman, as the evidence is on the record and the attorneys’ records are in the prosecutors’ hands. The Special Counsel, Durham can try a case in any federal district - and Durham’s next trial is coming up in Virginia.


32 posted on 05/31/2022 9:43:07 AM PDT by Always A Marine ("When you strike at a king, you must kill him" - Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

Durham’s whole investigation is now toast.


33 posted on 05/31/2022 9:43:40 AM PDT by kenmcg (tHE WHOLE )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

No justice for any of their wrongs will come until Judgement Day.

The global beast is running the show. Get out of this theater and start popping your own popcorn and making your own beverages.

Within 2 years, I will be out of my “freak state”. I have fled to the mountains, and many will be with me. We will rebuild to take care of our own. Food, water, and shelter is all we need, and those necessities will not come from this beast, that’s for sure.


34 posted on 05/31/2022 9:43:56 AM PDT by A child of Yah (I once was lost, but now I'm found, twas grace that set me free ... thank you LORD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Wow, I was just typing my post and submitted, and then now I see yours ... wow!


35 posted on 05/31/2022 9:45:02 AM PDT by A child of Yah (I once was lost, but now I'm found, twas grace that set me free ... thank you LORD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

It’s not an investigation. It’s a CYA op for DOJ and the swamp. Given that I doubt they shut it down.


36 posted on 05/31/2022 9:45:06 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

I wouldn’t argue with any of that.

I will say though, that if the law states you can’t lie to
the FBI, it should be upheld in court.

Can’t a judge nullify a jury decision if it is clearly
in conflict with the evidence presented?

I thought that I have seen that in the past, but perhaps
not.


37 posted on 05/31/2022 9:45:07 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

Black social INjustice

The prejudiced in the ghetto runs loud and clear


38 posted on 05/31/2022 9:45:55 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (#LeaveTheGOP. Pass it on Liberty Valance Time. The point of a gun is the only law they understan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

Gee a jury comprised of trump hating Clinton supporters I tell ya I’m stunned stunned..NOT


39 posted on 05/31/2022 9:46:24 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

If the law does not apply to some, then it does not apply to anyone.


40 posted on 05/31/2022 9:46:42 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson