Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abathar
Dumb question: Who has an auto insurance policy with a liability limit high enough to pay a $5.2 million claim?

I'll have to read the details of the story, but this sounds like it has to be some kind of umbrella liability coverage tied to an auto insurance policy.

2 posted on 06/10/2022 4:51:47 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
Dumb question: Who has an auto insurance policy with a liability limit high enough to pay a $5.2 million claim?

Until very recently, Michigan had unlimited Medical liability on car insurance.

5 posted on 06/10/2022 5:00:34 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

GEICO offers Umbrella Insurance.

Maybe that’s what’s covering this.. ?


11 posted on 06/10/2022 5:04:05 AM PDT by mewzilla (We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

“Who has an auto insurance policy with a liability limit high enough to pay a $5.2 million claim?”

Geico is my vehicle insurer, and they treat me well (so far). I have to re-read my liability and see if I can get a settlement for a foot sprain. s/


28 posted on 06/10/2022 5:39:55 AM PDT by max americana (Fired leftards at work since 2018 at every election just to see them cry. I hate them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

I haven’t read anything about the case but I can tell you how it might work in California.

Woman has a claim against insurance company. Woman has a million dollars coverage. Woman demands that the insurance company pay her the full million. Insurance company refuses with no good reason. Woman brings an “insurance bad faith” action against insurer. Court finds not only that insurance company had a duty to indemnify, but insurance company wrongfully denied coverage. In other words, it wasn’t a close call, it was just the insurance company stonewalling.

Woman is awarded full cost of injury, even if it’s two or three times the million she would have settled for, and punitive damages on top of that. Possibly also attorneys’ fees.

If the woman had been forced to sue the insurance company, pay lawyers, and at the end of the day gets ONLY what the insurance company was supposed to cough up with no hesitation in the first place, she would never challenge the insurance company.


33 posted on 06/10/2022 5:49:00 AM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child; woodpusher
Dumb question: Who has an auto insurance policy with a liability limit high enough to pay a $5.2 million claim?

This was my second thought.

My first thought was why would an auto insurance company be responsible for sex in a car which was voluntarily engaged in by both parties?

She might have a case against the guy, but beyond that? No.

More proof that courts are broken/insane.

44 posted on 06/10/2022 8:13:08 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Yeah, that’s what it boils down to. His policy has a “stuff that happens because of your car” clause. Which is probably meant to cover stuff like collateral damage if the car lights on fire or the like. And the guy said “hey wonder if I can pull this off”. And so far yes.

So everybody should be expecting mail from your insurance company with some slight changes in language.


49 posted on 06/10/2022 8:20:47 AM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson