I don’t share mene’s distress per his post above. I believe the shroud to be genuine. The methodology on the carbon 14 was garbage and bungled. I’ve studied this as extensively as one can, given the available literature. All that said, this article adds nothing to the scholarship
Yes. I’ve read a lot on it, it basically says what the other articles have said for years but it’s nice to have an article come out and state it again, for those who have constantly said, ‘it’s only 500 years old or something, it’s paint, blah blah blah’.
It’s a miracle for us.
Agree