Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dforest
The ruling isn’t as outlandish as it seems.

The ballots in question arrived on time and/or with postmarks indicating that they had been mailed before the deadline.

The PA courts ruled in favor of counting these ballots because they were faced with a ludicrous scenario where the PA law required ballots to be mailed in envelopes that had dates on them, but didn’t specify WHICH date was to be posted. So some precincts followed the letter of the law and accepted ballots with ludicrous dates like July 4, 1776 and December 7, 1941 posted on them.

9 posted on 06/16/2022 10:52:32 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

” where the PA law required “

Ludicrous?

Then change the law.

Ballot access & qualification, both for the Candidate and for the Votes are key methods for controlling elections in Blue States.


14 posted on 06/16/2022 11:08:37 AM PDT by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson