Posted on 06/16/2022 5:24:26 PM PDT by DFG
I might support such a bill IF it was enforced on criminal acts. Commit a crime with a gun, and no insurance gets an automatic extra 15 years in prison. /s
Only if there is a requirement to force people who vote for Democrats to pay for liability insurance! $1000/head monthly!
Hey look, another gun law to ignore.
Unconstitutional.
No. With a side of F-U.
Shall not be infringed.
I lived in Los Angeles for over 29 years.
I have a mental picture of the Crips & the Bloods buying LIABILITY insurance...along with all the other gangs.
SURE I DO...!!!
Like Obama/Roberts health care ruling.
“Guns kill more people than cars“.
A blatant lie.
L
Next in California: liability insurance required for baseball bats, hammers, kitchen knives, screwdrivers, etc. Idiot lawmakers are crazy!
Not sure about California, but most homeowner’s insurance already includes firearm liability coverage.
Such a bill requiring criminals to get liability insurance for their guns would be ruled unconstitutional because it would be forcing a criminal to provide evidence against himself. So the bill would be enforceable ONLY to law-abiding gun owners.
only reason is to try to have another way to tag owners.
Bet that anything the left wing legislature require will not be something insurance companies will sell. The intent of the legislators is 100% poisonous to gun owners.
First they will pass this. Then they will claim that POC are being effected unfairly and in the name of equity pass another bill paying for their insurance.
How about libel/defamation insurance for all reporters/media that is a minimum of $50,000,000 to compensate the plaintiff for loss of reputation for false/misleading statements made by these folks. Also, the same for all politicians for defamation/libel of any person/entity, regardless of the “speech and debate” exemption.
Think of it this way; journalist and politicians, (sitting congressmen), have a 1st amendment immunity but they should not be able to use that immunity to shield them from misuse of their right. If they harm someone with the exercise of their right then they should have to have insurance to pay for it.
“Guns kill more people than cars. “
i base this on nothing. but.. the heck they do.
will parole boards have to carry insurance as well
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.