Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Susan Collins: Abortion ruling ‘inconsistent’ with what Gorsuch, Kavanaugh told me
The Hill ^ | 06/24/22 1:01 PM ET | BY ALEXANDER BOLTON

Posted on 06/25/2022 12:12:42 AM PDT by RandFan

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) on Friday said conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch misled her about their views on the importance of Supreme Court precedent during their confirmation proceedings in 2017 and 2018.

Collins, who voted to confirm then-President Trump’s first two conservative nominees to the court despite her support for abortion rights, has said she believed those justices would hold up important precedents such as Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that established a constitutional right to abortion. A court majority that included Kavanaugh and Gorsuch struck down that right on Friday.

“This decision is inconsistent with what Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said in their testimony and their meetings with me, where they both were insistent on the importance of supporting long-standing precedents that the country has relied upon,” Collins said, explaining her votes for those nominees during the Trump administration.

Collins joined Democrats Friday in denouncing the decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

“The Supreme Court has abandoned a fifty-year precedent at a time that the country is desperate for stability,” she said in a statement. “This ill-considered action will further divide the country at a moment when, more than ever in modern times, we need the Court to show both consistency and restraint.”

Collins argued that “throwing out a precedent overnight that the country has relied upon for half a century is not conservative.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Maine
KEYWORDS: abortion; bidenvoters; brettkavanaugh; gorsuch; kavanaugh; neilgorsuch; roevswade; roevwade; scotus; senate; supremecourt; susancollins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2022 12:12:42 AM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Roe v. Wade was not IN FACT precedent. Precedent was in the states. And at one point, abortion was illegal in every state in the country.


2 posted on 06/25/2022 12:14:42 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Collins needs to write and pass R v. W legislation, not complain about Judicial legislation being disappeared.

She needs to do her job, not whine.


3 posted on 06/25/2022 12:15:44 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Penumbra-created law is not a precedent, and no badly made law should be considered precedent for future decisions.


4 posted on 06/25/2022 12:17:25 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Zactly...


5 posted on 06/25/2022 12:18:34 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

she continues to mislead everyone that she is a republican


6 posted on 06/25/2022 12:19:31 AM PDT by joshua c (Dump the LEFT. Cable tv, Big tech, national name brands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

The world would be so much a better place if Sen. Susan Collins would self abort.


7 posted on 06/25/2022 12:19:34 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skr

It is just what I was going to write. However, what you said was done perfectly.


8 posted on 06/25/2022 12:25:01 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Notice both Collins and Manchin can’t specifically state that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh didn’t state they wouldn’t overturn Roe V Wade, but expressed a desire to respect long-standing law. That doesn’t mean RvW wasn’t on shaky legal ground, as Ginsburg herself said. As such, it deserved a review of its constitutionality. That issue is now where it belongs.. with the legislators and voters of the individual states.


9 posted on 06/25/2022 12:29:45 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Кчерту Путина, Kчерту Россию)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

*can’t specifically state that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh stated…


10 posted on 06/25/2022 12:32:26 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Кчерту Путина, Kчерту Россию)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Libs are using that point of view on Facebook to advocate to impeach justices or expand the court.


11 posted on 06/25/2022 12:53:09 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Way toooooooo many RINOs in this country, way too many.


12 posted on 06/25/2022 1:17:01 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

For once Susan was the People’s useful idiot instead of the other way around! BTW I don’t believe any of this “aww shucks this isn’t what I expected” for one Maine minute - it’s stuff like this which is why Collins has kept that seat for so long.


13 posted on 06/25/2022 1:19:05 AM PDT by No_Mas_Obama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No_Mas_Obama

We would still have slavery if wrongly decided laws stood
the test of time just for having stupid longevity.

Just like “old Shakey Collins” has been Rino Wrong for far
too long and should resign and tend to her failing health.


14 posted on 06/25/2022 1:30:53 AM PDT by Zenjitsuman (f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Dred Scot was once precedence...


15 posted on 06/25/2022 1:33:11 AM PDT by Chicory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Liar.

You’re just trying to do damage control to your image.


16 posted on 06/25/2022 1:40:38 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Its stupid of Man chin and Collins to ask how a judge would rule on a case before hearing all the evidence given. If a nominee were to actually do that, they should be shut down immediately and their application canned.


17 posted on 06/25/2022 1:52:35 AM PDT by duckbutt (Those who pay no taxes have no check on their appetite for services. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

I suppose they have to say this for political purposes.

Not a surprise. Unprincipled hacks.


18 posted on 06/25/2022 1:52:54 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Like many elder politicians they’re are showing cognitive deficiencies in processing simply answers to questions.


19 posted on 06/25/2022 1:56:43 AM PDT by existentially_kuffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Sort of like her voting record is almost always inconsistent with the oath of office she swore to.


20 posted on 06/25/2022 1:58:54 AM PDT by Iron Munro ( Joe Biden - Inventor Of The First New Language since Esperanto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson