That’s certainly a big problem but I’m not sure SCOTUS thinks the solution is to ignore the constitution(s).
I think SCOTUS is sick of legislators being overruled based on the INTERPRETATION of the state constitution.
One clear example is Voter ID. In several cases, the state constitution was silent on the issue, and the legislators enacted Voter ID law. The activist judge struck down Voter ID even though the state constitution was silent on the matter. That's not right. That's what SCOTUS is seemingly addressing.