The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;
Just like DC, MA will now have 90% Dem vote.
Yes, and this effort in MA is legal. My question is, “How will they prevent duplicate ballots from being mailed out?”
If a certain John Doe is listed with 10 different mailing addresses, will that John Doe receive a ballot at each of those addresses?
If so, wouldn’t that mean that he gets more opportunities to vote than the average MA citizen?
Voter rolls are known to be horribly flawed.
Bfl
The only way this stuff gets overturned is when a Democrat looses due to massive fraud. Sorry, but that’s the way it is.
Mail-in ballots and early voting six months early democrats never change.
Massachusetts was one of the states used to pump up Basement Joe's "vote" totals to 81 million:
Obama 2008 1,904,097 Hillary 2016 1,995,196 Biden 2020 2,382,202
Notice how the Joek "voters" poured out of the Massachusetts basements to make their tally for the old white guy - nearly 400,000 more than voted for Biden's Clean and Articulate Guy in his record turnout year of 2008.
Maybe Massachusetts Democrats are just racists...
Charlie Baker just assured that no Republican will be governor ever again in Massachusetts.
Indeed, that language is clear on its face.
Further, that the State legislatures designate where in the State the meeting of electors will take place, usually in the State capital.
With that, isn't it likely the founders understood that "places" contemplated the voters for those electors would likewise physically appear at a designated voting location?
Everything is infiltrated. Even most of the republican governors are infiltrators.
The Left, the Democrats, and the Judiciary have no interest in fair elections, too much risk that the wrong side could win the election. Much better to have sham elections where the outcome is predetermined and the election is nothing but a sham to convince the public that elections represent the will of the people. If you are living in a state that stage these kinds of elections, leave. The sooner the better.
SCOTUS ruled,9-0,that the "SJC's" ruling that the law in question didn't violate Caetano's was "frivolous".
Is there a clause in the state constitution that governs other elections?