Posted on 07/18/2022 6:25:59 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
The Pulitzer Prize Board on Monday announced it is standing by awards given to the New York Times and Washington Post for their reports on the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.
“In the last three years, the Pulitzer Board has received inquiries, including from former President Donald Trump, about submissions from The New York Times and The Washington Post on Russian interference in the U.S. election and its connections to the Trump campaign–submissions that jointly won the 2018 National Reporting prize,” the organization’s statement reads.
“These inquiries prompted the Pulitzer Board to commission two independent reviews of the work submitted by those organizations to our National Reporting competition,” the board continued before announcing the establishment media outlets will keep their prizes.
“The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes,” the board claimed.
In total, 20 articles were challenged with formal complaints. All 20 were ruled factual by the Pulitzer Prize Board. The questioned articles include the following titles:
FBI was to pay author of Trump dossier (WaPo) Trump reveals secret intelligence to Russians (WaPo) Trump crafted son’s statement on Russian contact (WaPo) Trump’s Son Heard of Link To Moscow Before Meeting (NYT) Emails Disclose Trump Son’s Glee At Russian Offer (NYT) Unlikely Source Propelled Russian Meddling Inquiry (NYT) Undisclosed On Forms, Kushner Met 2 Russians (NYT) Despite claims by Democrats and establishment media reports that former President Donald Trump colluded with Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, those claims were found to be baseless. In March of 2019, the Mueller report found no evidence Donald Trump colluded with Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
It came out clean as a whistle.
Fake award, then.
they failed to mention it was an award in the fiction division.
They are every bit as valid as the Pulitzer for Walter Duranty’s “reporting”
Fake awards...fake people...fake justice...fake future.😕☠
I didn’t know there was a fiction division for the Pulitzer.
An Idiot Award given to an Idiot Organization. How inspiring is that?
As if we hadn’t pegged this award for what it was years ago.
So the story was false, but the awards were good, got it.
Bump
An award for defrauding the American People.
They did the same about Stalin and the Holodomore.
“...two independent reviews of the work submitted by those organizations to our National Reporting competition.”
What organizations? Name them damnit and damnyou.
My favorite fake Pulitzer Prize award was JFK’s “Profile in Courage”.
For those who don’t know the story behind it:
https://www.straightdope.com/21343607/did-john-f-kennedy-really-write-profiles-in-courage
Ted Sorenson confessed in his book:
https://www.amazon.com/COUNSELOR-Life-at-Edge-History/dp/0060798718
JFK gave Sorenson no credit—ever.
Was just going to mention Duranty. Watched the movie “Mr Jones” a few days ago, dramatizes Gareth Jones battles with Duranty, powerful and disturbing film.
pulitzer is so yesterday
they need a new prize
you know something to do with journalism
.
What do you expect?
It’s about time Pulitizer started handing out Fake New Awards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.