Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flashback: Walz apologized for voting in favor of bill to protect abortion survivors
Alpha News ^ | 7/23/22 | Evan Stambaugh

Posted on 07/23/2022 11:26:42 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo

The bill would have required health care workers to treat infants born alive after an abortion the same as any other infant at the same gestational age.

In January 2018, when now-governor Tim Walz was still a congressman in the U.S. House, he apologized for “accidentally” voting in favor of a bill protecting infants who survived an abortion.

The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (HR 4712), which passed the U.S. House by a 241-183 vote, said it would require health workers to treat infants born alive after an abortion (or attempted abortion) the same as any other infant at the same gestational age, and to ensure the infant receives immediate medical attention at a hospital.

Only six Democrats voted in favor of the bill, but one of them did so on accident. Then-Rep. Walz felt compelled to publicly clarify that his vote was an “honest mistake.”

“I meant to vote NO, as I did on an identical bill last Congress. My apologies for the confusion. I’ll keep fighting for women’s access to health care,” he tweeted at the time.

Attached was an image of Walz’s statement asking former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan to change his vote.

“My intent was to vote NO on HR 4712,” he wrote. “A procedural vote was added to the scheduled vote series and my Yes vote was on my approval of the journal.”

(Excerpt) Read more at alphanews.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: abortion; walz
“While Tim Walz has bragged about being so pro-abortion that Nancy Pelosi told him to tone it down..."
1 posted on 07/23/2022 11:26:42 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

2 posted on 07/23/2022 11:33:01 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Apologized to who?


3 posted on 07/23/2022 11:49:04 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Twitter.


4 posted on 07/23/2022 11:53:12 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (The best things in life aren't things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
“I meant to vote NO, as I did on an identical bill last Congress. My apologies for the confusion. I’ll keep fighting for women’s access to health care,” he tweeted at the time.

Giving a baby who survives an abortion medical treatment has NOTHING to do with women’s access to healthcare.

His “mistaken” vote would not have had the least effect on the mother.

5 posted on 07/23/2022 3:18:53 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson