To: ChicagoConservative27
“Government prosecutor Jay Bratt last week argued that unsealing the affidavit would “provide a roadmap” of an ongoing investigation still in its early stages”
Please allow me to translate:
“We plan to drag this out for 2 1/2 years in a effort ruin Trump and his bid to run for POTUS again”
14 posted on
08/22/2022 10:09:17 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave)
To: V_TWIN
Maybe the judge was getting a few offers he couldn’t refuse. After all this is Florida. Or he has reread the full affidavit and he realizes that the information is so damning against Trump he wants to be released.
24 posted on
08/22/2022 10:13:31 AM PDT by
magua
(It's not racism, it's just that thisBecause it’s being reported that a lot of this started in 2015.)
To: V_TWIN
another paraphrase:
dementia joe’s DoJ: “it’s WAY too much trouble to have to propose redactions and it would set a TERRIBLE precedent that future affidavits can’t automatically be kept completely secret ...”
42 posted on
08/22/2022 10:27:11 AM PDT by
catnipman
(In a post-covid world, ALL "science" is now political science: stolen elections have consequences)
To: V_TWIN
“Government prosecutor Jay Bratt last week argued that unsealing the affidavit would “provide a roadmap” of an ongoing investigation still in its early stages” Would that be the ongoing investigation into Trump's collusion with Martians to hack the next election?
121 posted on
08/22/2022 12:43:28 PM PDT by
TChad
("Joe, we should evacuate the civilians before the military. You understand that, right? Joe?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson