Hey! It Does! :
T----- -------- ----------- ----- ----- ----
---- --- ---- -----r. ---- ---- ---- --- -----.
---- ---- --- ------ --- - ----- o- --- ------- ---- -----
--u ------ ----b-- --------- --- ---- --------- -- ----------.
l------ --- --e ------.
This is an issue for the Govt
This case has unusual precedents. Comey is on record explaining why Hillary and Huma Abedin should not be charged IN PAINSTAKING DETAIL.
In fact, Comey said, in both cases, Criminal Intent was necessary to be charged.
Comey, for Huma too, goes down the list of violations - and then says there was no Criminal Intent there, so there wouldn’t be any charges.
Cases usually have Judicial Rulings as precedents, but this case is highly unusual because the charging decisions and the basis behind those non-charges have been delineated under oath to Congress. And the Law hasn’t changed.
One of the tenets of Law is it shouldn’t be arbitrary and capricious.
Indeed we will fill in the lines after the hanging.
Judge Roy Bean